PSYC 1100 Week 11 Discussion | Kwantlen Polytechnic University
- Kwantlen Polytechnic University / PSYC 1100
- 10 Aug 2022
- Price: $8
- Humanities Assignment Help / Psychology Assignment Help
PSYC 1100 Week 11 Discussion | Kwantlen Polytechnic University
Peer Learning
Discussion Week 11
Memory
Enhancement Strategies
Provide examples of
how, when, and for which course you used each of the memory enhancement
strategies below:
1. Elaborative rehearsal
2. Linking new
information to examples and items already in memory
3. Organizing information
4. Overlearning the material
5. Distributing the
material over time
6. Minimizing interference
7. Using imagery
OR
How
Accurate Are Young Children’s Memories?
There is a controversy
surrounding the accuracy of young children’s memories, including concerns of
both over-reporting (false reporting) and under-reporting of child abuse cases.
In a study on children’s susceptibility to suggestive questioning, Leichtman
and Ceci (1995) conducted a study, in which 3- to 6-year-old children were told
stories about Sam Stone (who was repeatedly described to one experimental
subsample of the children as being clumsy). One day, “Sam” came to the
children’s classroom, was introduced, and behaved innocuously. The next day,
children were shown a book that had been ripped and a teddy bear that had been
soiled—things that Sam clearly had not done when he was present. Over the next
ten weeks, children were interviewed several times, and some were asked
suggestive questions about Sam, such as whether he tore the book on purpose.
Finally, two weeks later, a new interviewer asked all the children to describe
Sam’s visit to the classroom. Children who had heard suggestive stories about
Sam before or after his appearance (i.e., the treatment group) made more false
reports about his behaviour than the control group of children who had not
received the suggestive treatment. Answer the following critical thinking
questions about this experiment:
1. Does the evidence
reported here indicate that the memories of the children who received the
suggestive treatment actually changed?
2. Are there other
ways of explaining the children’s false reports than assuming they incorrectly
remembered what they had seen?
3. What kind of
experiments could be devised that would test alternative hypotheses concerning
the factors underlying the false reports of the experimental groups of children
in the Leichtman and Ceci experiment?