POLI 330 Week 3 Discussion | chamberlain university
- chamberlain university / POLI 330
- 18 Oct 2021
- Price: $8
- Humanities Assignment Help / Political Science Assignment Help
POLI 330 Week 3 Discussion | chamberlain university
Week 3 Discussion: Pros and Cons of Interest Groups,
and Corporations
Required
Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
- Textbook: Chater 7, 8
- Lesson
- Minimum of 1 scholarly source (can include your
textbook)
Initial
Post Instructions
For the initial post, respond to one
of the following options, and label the beginning of your post indicating
either Option 1 or Option 2:
- Option 1:
What are the pros and cons of lobbyists as a tool for special interest
groups? Should former members of Congress be allowed to become lobbyists?
Explain your answer.
- Option 2:
Social movements can at times use disruptive behaviors. What are some of
the possible benefits of disruptive behaviors in social movements? What
are the drawbacks or possible negative consequences? What does the First
Amendment state concerning citizens' right to use disruptive methods?
Refer to examples from history as you frame your analysis. Explain your
answer.
Be sure to make connections between
your ideas and conclusions and the research, concepts, terms, and theory we are
discussing this week.
Follow-Up
Post Instructions
Respond to at least one peer.
Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification. Minimum
of 1 scholarly source which can include your textbook or assigned readings or
may be from your additional scholarly research.
Writing
Requirements
- Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)
- Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online
lessons and an outside source)
- APA format for in-text citations and list of references
Grading
This activity will be graded using
the Discussion Grading Rubric. Please review the following link:
- Link (webpage): Discussion
Guidelines
Course Outcomes (CO): 2, 4, 6
USA 
India