MNGT 5000 Week 3 Case Study Assignment | Webster University
- Webster University / MNGT 5000
- 09 Jul 2021
- Price: $7
- Management Assignment Help / Management Information Systems
MNGT 5000 Week 3 Case Study Assignment | Webster University
Case Analysis
#3 on Organizational Control and Culture
Instructions: Please read the
following case description of "Pine Tree Natural Foods". After
reading this case, you should prepare an analysis following the assignment
instructions below. The purpose of this assignment is for you to demonstrate
that you can apply the concepts, principles, and theories presented primarily in week 6 course readings. Your analysis
must employ only the facts presented in the case description below. This case
description is fictionalized for purposes of this analysis.
This assignment is worth 100 points.
Please post your completed case analysis under the "Assignments" tab.
Pine Tree Natural Foods
Headquartered in Cheyenne, Wyoming, Pine Tree Natural Foods is the leading
independent food retailer in the Rocky Mountain region. Its stores feature
gourmet, natural, and organic products, competitive prices, and high-quality
service. In 2011, Pine Tree’s 33 stores in 25 stores in Colorado, Wyoming, and
New Mexico achieved total annual revenues of $251 million and a net income of
almost $6 million. The company began as a small seasonal produce stand in 1966
run by a young U.S. Marine Corps veteran named James Costa in a small town just
outside of Cheyenne.
During the decade of the 70s, Costa took over a couple of independent grocery
stores in nearby small towns. In each case, Costa was approached by an owner
seeking advice on how to improve his business. Instead of offering advice,
Costa offered to buy the store and let the former owner continue to manage it.
In the decade of the 80s, Costa managed to acquire three more stores in much
the same way, thus growing into the region’s first independent grocery chain
with multiple locations.
Once the decade of the 90s arrived, the pace of acquisitions throughout the
grocery industry accelerated dramatically. Although many of the acquisitions
proved to be a disappointment to the acquiring company, Pine Tree Natural Foods
acquired one store after another after another, successfully increasing both
its sales and net income. Austin, Texas-based Whole Foods Market led the charge
in organic/natural food market segment, and Costa was approached more than once
with an offer to buy his small but growing chain. Pine Tree enjoyed a
significant advantage over other companies looking to make acquisitions based
on its strategy of partnering with the owners/managers of the stores it
acquired.
In 2004, Costa decided to retire and the reins of his company to his daughter
Erin who had been working in the company since she graduated from college
several years earlier. Erin had proven to have a knack for the grocery business
in general and the organic/natural food business specifically. Before he
retired, Costa managed one last deal, the acquisition of two warehouses that he
turned into distribution centers, each with almost 25,000 square feet of space.
These new distribution centers enabled the company to develop a very efficient
distribution system designed to support the growing number of stores and allow
for additional growth down the road.
By this point in time, Pine Tree Natural Foods found itself competing against
supermarkets, supercenters, and other store positioned in the
natural/organic/gourmet market space. The leading companies in this space include
Whole Foods Market, Trader Joe’s, Sunflower Farmers Market, Earth Fare, and
Sprouts Farmers Market.
The company’s target consumer is highly educated, upper income, informed, and
very health-conscious. The typical store in the chain is under 18,000 square
feet, and many of the stores are found in less-desirable areas, which provides
the company with lower lease and occupancy costs. The large supermarket chains
typically carry around 60,000 stock-keeping units (SKU), while Pine Tree
carried less than 20,000, meaning that it had less inventory to manage and, as
a result, could exercise tighter control. The company also did not carry its
own private label.
General managers of each of the company’s stores, many of whom previously owned
the stores they now managed, are provided with significant autonomy for
instituting local pricing, hiring personnel and establishing their
compensation, and responding to the needs of the communities they served. This
kind of autonomy is unusual among those retailers in this market space who own
multiple units; in contrast, most of these types of decision at other retailers
were the purview of the corporate office.
One of Pine Tree’s practices that is not popular among the managers of its
acquired stores is the use of slotting allowances (also known as slotting fees)
that are typically paid by suppliers to gain shelf space for new products. Many
of these managers and others in the industry believed that this practice placed
smaller manufacturers and distributors at a significant disadvantage vis-à-vis
the larger, more well-established players.
As the company added more stores to its portfolio, the corporate office took on
much larger responsibilities for activities and processes that were common to
all of the stores including payroll, advertising, and promotion, and
information technology support, the latter being critical to the company’s
supply operations and its tight financial controls.
Over the years, the company had achieved a strong reputation for improving the
performance of its acquisitions. Typically, within two years of acquisition,
the new stores increased their sales per square foot by 20%, and increased
margins by a full one percent or more. These improvements were not due to price
increases as was sometimes the case with acquisitions; instead, the primary
driver was the company’s focus on instilling strong financial and managerial
discipline through the use of relevant performance measures and financial
controls than the stores had been using prior to being acquired. Financial
discipline in particular was a critical component in the company’s accounting
control system as the management team placed significant emphasis on managing
by the numbers. Store managers were taught to use the yearly business plan and
financial forecasts available from the system, and they used them as tools to
manage the day-to-day operations of their stores. This control system also
assisted the general managers with setting and meeting their performance
targets with key metrics focused on inventory turns (how often inventory turns
over during a specific period), cash conversion cycle, and return on assets
(ROA).
The company used its operational and financial measures as criteria for its
performance-based compensation plan for store managers. Important components of
this plan included the quarterly results of both service quality and employee
empowerment surveys because the company wanted its managers to care as much
about their employees and the working environment as they did about the
experiences of customers who shopped in their stores. Each of the general and
department managers had the potential to earn bonuses of up to 25% of their
salary based on company, store, and individual performance, and store managers
received a bonus pool that they could use to reward individual employee
performance. Unfortunately, implementing the stringent financial control system
in newly-acquired stores did not always go well as in some cases the conversion
was difficult, time consuming, and negatively affected customer service.
Another method that Pine Tree uses to integrate its acquisitions is the
assignment of a ‘mentor store’ to share information and expertise with the
managers of newly-acquired stores in an effort to help them build their
competency and expertise in the company’s operating procedures and practices.
The typical routine if for the manager and some of the associates from the
‘mentor store’ to spend two or three days each month at the new store and,
conversely, the new store would send some of its personnel to the ‘mentor
store’ to learn based on observation how things were done. In addition, Pine
Tree schedules a quarterly retreat for all of its store managers, during which
participants gain experience through working together, exchanging ideas, and
learning together. This retreat is a very powerful tool for transmitting the
company’s values and operating standards.
Today, Pine Tree finds itself faced with the task of integrating its newest
acquisition, which is quite unlike its previous acquisitions given that it is
outside of its normal operating territory, involves a chain of seven stores
rather than a single store, and has revenues equal to nearly half of Pine
Tree’s total sales. The acquired company, Organic Grocers, which is based in
Las Vegas, Nevada, is a surprising target for Pine Tree because it had lost
money during the previous three-year period, in part due to the real estate
bust that devastated the local economy, but also in part because the founder of
the chain had died and his heirs had shown little interest in managing the
chain. The heirs were so eager to unload the burden of the chain that they were
willing to sell it at a significantly lower price than Pine Tree had initially
been willing to pay.
Many managers at Pine Tree are not fully onboard with the acquisition of
Organic Grocers, in part because they feared that Pine Tree’s motives for
making the acquisitions were really aimed learning how to emulate Organic’s
top-down management style of using technology to mandate common processes and
policies across stores without regard to local circumstances. Erin Costa has
heard these concerns, and she now wonders if Pine Tree’s customary methods of
improving store performance will work with this particular acquisition, and
also wonders if she should consider taking additional steps or try new ways for
Pine Tree’s management to meet the challenges associated with successful
integration of Organic Grocers.
Assignment: You have been hired by Erin Costa to
help her devise an effective strategy for integrating the control systems of
Organic Grocers with those of Pine Tree. Your deliverable to Ms. Costa is a
detailed report in which you will recommend changes to the existing control
system, and propose the addition of new controls, if either or both are
considered appropriate. The analysis should begin with a discussion of the
advantages Pine Tree gained from its use of tight financial controls and loose
operational controls, and the advantages and disadvantages of considering the
top-down controls used by Organic Grocers. The report must provide Ms.
Costa with at least two alternatives she could consider for integrating the
control systems of the two companies, and should rely on the various forms of
control discussed in Chapter 16 of Management: Leading and
Collaborating in a Competitive World.
Note: This fictitious case description was adapted from a case written by
Harvard Business School Professor Rosabeth Moss Kanter and writer Paul Myers.
Any resemblance to real persons or companies is coincidental.