LE 300 Week 5 Discussion 2 | Park University | Assignment Help
- Park University / LE 300
- 21 May 2021
- Price: $8
- Humanities Assignment Help / Educational Assignment Help
LE 300 Week 5 Discussion 2 | Park University | Assignment Help
Unit 5: Discussion
Instructions
Please choose
one of the following questions to answer for this unit...
You should also respond to two of your classmates' postings .
Before answering this
unit's questions, you should read “The Unbearable Straightness of Violence:
Queering Serial Murder in True Crime,” p. 209 in Natural Born Celebrities.
Keep in mind, as you
read, a few of the questions posted below.
Directions
Full-bodied entries—of
at least ten sentences of writing from you (in addition to quotations from the
text)—are more likely to receive full credit. Lesser credit will be assigned to
work that is missing, brief, or clearly disengaged or sloppily produced such
that miscues interfere with readability.
Your responses to
other students’ work are also assessed. Students often resist commenting on
each others’ work in substantial ways; instead choosing to post simply “good
job” or “looks okay to me.” This kind of peer response doesn’t help your own—or
your peers’—development as a writer and thinker.
Acceptable peer
responses will, among other things:
·
Explicitly identify what was learned from someone else’s work.
·
Ask a follow-up question.
·
Offer an alternative interpretation.
·
Offer concrete strategies for improvement.
Questions (Natural
Born Celebrities)
Choose one questions:
1.
On p. 209, Schmid argues that one of the ways we can stop
audiences from identifying with serial killers is to use their abused or
abnormal childhood to separate them from our own experiences. How does this
work in The Talented Mr. Ripley? Relate the material in Schmid's
chapter to the film/novel we viewed in this unit?
2.
On p. 221, Schmid suggests that most novels/films portray the
killers as sexual deviants, but they do so in a way that implies that serial
killers are somehow "not normal" in their appetites. This quickly
leads to questions of homosexuality or bisexuality as easy targets. If the
killers are heterosexual, their sexuality is never mentioned. How does this argument
play out in The Talented Mr. Ripley?
3.
Throughout this complex chapter, Schmid argues that often the
murderers portray a fear or hatred of women as motive for their killing. How
does Ripley alter or complicate Schmid's argument?
Question Attachments
0 attachments —