EN 106 Week 2 Discussion

EN 106 Week 2 Discussion | Park University | Assignment Help 

Unit 2: Discussion

Welcome to the unit discussion area for EN106. This area will fill up quickly with lively interchanges among you, your colleagues and your instructor. Check back often!

Important!  Most units, you are required to post your own responses before you can see your classmates' responses. The reason for this is that your instructor and classmates are interested in your thoughts on the subject! Remember, most of the topics in discussion have to do with your analysis and interpretation, not an objective right/wrong answer. Your unit discussion responses are graded not only for accuracy but also for creativity and insight. See the Grading and Assessment page for more details.

Due Dates: Your initial (first) post is due no later than Thursday Noon Central Standard Time (CST), with the expectation that you will return between Thursday and Sunday to converse with your peers.

Assessment: See the Grading and Assessment content item under Course Information.

For all references, use an appropriate form of documentation (MLA, APA, or another standard academic style discussed in Easy Writer.)

Discussion Topic

To complete this unit's discussion, create two separate posts: one for each of the 2 prompts below.

Prompt 1

Effective academic writers know how to summarize. In this prompt, use Greene and Lidinsky's categories to practice summarizing one of the assigned articles from Ch. 14. Write about a paragraph for each:

Describe the key claims of the text. To understand the shape and direction of the argument, study how paragraphs begin and end, and pay attention to the author’s point of view and use of transitions. Then combine what you have learned into a few sentences describing the key claims.

Select examples to illustrate the author’s argument. Find one or two examples to support each key claim. You may need only one example when you write your summary – and you may need to either quote or paraphrase it.

Present the gist of the author’s argument. Describe the author’s central idea in your own language with an eye to where you expect your argument to go. (Hint: to ensure that you are using your own language, try to present the argument in a different order than Freire does. In other words, don't try to summarize paragraph by paragraph. Instead, try to explain his position as simply and clearly as you can.)

Contextualize what you summarize. Cue your readers into the conversation. Who is the author? Where and when did the text appear? Why was the author writing? Who else is in the conversation?

Your post for this prompt should be about 150-200 words, and should include in-text citations for any quotations or paraphrases.

Prompt 2

As you learned in this week's lecture, academic writing can be thought of as a conversation. (Remember Burke's metaphor of the parlor?) After reading the assigned articles from Ch. 14, how would you describe the conversation of ideas these articles are a part of? What is the subject of this "parlor"? If you were to make a contribution to this conversation, what you say?

Your post for this prompt should be about 100-200 words, and should include in-text citations for any quoted or paraphrased material.

Follow-up posts

In your follow-up posts this unit, comment on a classmate's post by offering an alternative perspective, asking questions, pointing out something you noticed about their post. Imagine you are in Burke's parlor -- add your voice to the conversation!