HUMU 250 Week 6

HUMU 250 Week 6 | Assignment Help | Brandman University

Multimedia Presentation DRAFT for Peer Evaluation in Week 7

HUMU 250: Final Project Peer Evaluation Assignment

All peer reviews are due no later than THURSDAY night by 11:59PM of Week 7 so that you have time to revise before turning the project in on Sunday night!

Once you have turned your project in to the Discussion Board folder in Week 6, select a minimum of two other projects which have not yet been peer reviewed (first-come, first-served). View it, and then answer these questions in a “reply” to the original post.

Note: This assignment is separate from the Discussion Grade and is worth points. Do a thorough job.

1.      Posting your own presentation on time and complete (all slides and narration, though there may be some typos or organizational issues common to drafts). (15 points)

2.      Answer the following (10 points):

a.      How has the project met the requirements of the assignment?

b.      What is the thesis? If you can’t locate it, what do you think the thesis is supposed to be?

c.      What are the main points supporting the thesis?

d.      What evidence is used and how do you know it’s credible?

e.      How does the speaker analyze the issue?

f.       Is the audio natural? Or does it sound like someone “reading a script”?

3.      What are the possible future benefits the technology poses for society as discussed in the presentation? If you aren’t sure, explain why. (5 points)

4.      What are the possible future challenges the technology poses for society as discussed in the presentation? If you aren’t sure, explain why. (5 points)

1.      [Authors: If what the viewer is learning isn’t what you set out to teach, you have some revising to do].

                        What was the best part of this presentation? What could still use some work? (Really think about this—don’t just say “nothing, it was great”). (5 points)

                        On a scale of 10 (10 being highest), how would you rate this draft? Be constructive but be honest. There’s still time for the author to revise before turning this in for a grade—give them ideas on how to make the presentation better. (10 points)