BUS 311 Week 2 Discussion 2 | Ashford University
- ashford university / BUS 311
- 17 Apr 2021
- Price: $8
- Management Assignment Help / Operation Management Assignment Help
BUS 311 Week 2 Discussion 2 | Ashford University
Week 2 - Discussion 2
Your
initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7
(Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the
quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the
Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on
how your discussion will be evaluated.
|
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) |
Read
the Ace Heating and Cooling scenario in your text and answer the following
questions:
·
Under UCC 2-302, who has the best
chance of getting out of the contract due to unconsionability?
·
The symbol for justice features a
woman wearing a blindfold illustrating that the law should be applied the same
way regardless of who the parties are. Does the UCC rule seem to contradict
this? Which approach do you think is more ethical?
·
Note that both Glamour and Shady Rest
are businesses, and courts rarely find that contracts between two businesses
are unconscionable. The rationale is that a business is a sophisticated entity,
familiar with transactions and able to protect itself. Do you think Glamour and
Shady Rest are in a comparable position in regard to this contract? Why or why
not?
Guided Response: Respond to at least two of your classmates by Day 7,
explaining your position and why you agree or disagree with their comments. Do
you think the contracts are fair or unfair considering the parties had a
disproportionate ability to bargain? Under UCC Section 2-302 the court has the
discretion to find the contract unconscionable. Do you think this is a good
approach? What other methods to resolve this issue is appropriate?
USA 
India