Business Management Assignment Help
- Other / Other
- 13 Mar 2021
- Price: $10
- Management Assignment Help / Human Resource management Assignment help
Business Management Assignment Help
Chapter
13: The Inclusive Workplace—Level I Inclusion Through Diversity within the Work
Organization
Chapter 13: The Inclusive Workplace—Level I
Inclusion Through Diversity within the Work Organization
Chapter
Overview
The
first level of the Inclusive Workplace, diversity within work organizations, relates to the
organization’s internal relations with its own employees and reflects the
“micro” system level within the organizations that of individuals and groups.
While an exclusionary workplace is based on the perception that all workers
need to conform to pre-established organizational values and norms (determined
by its “mainstream”), the inclusive workplace is based on a pluralistic value
frame that relies on mutual respect and equal contributions from different
cultural perspectives to the organization’s values and norms.
This
chapter examines Level I of the inclusive workplace model: Inclusion Through
Diversity Within the Work Organization. Inclusive policies and practices
applied to Level I are discussed, as well as the barriers and benefits to
implementing such approach. A case illustration of Denny’s Inc. wraps up the
examination of Level I.
Inclusive
Policies and Practices
A
variety of policies and practices constitute inclusion at Level I—from
recruitment, through mentorship and training, to cultural audit and linking
diversity practices to strategic goals. What distinguishes an inclusive
workplace from an organization that merely implements diversity initiatives is
the comprehensive approach to diversity that is part of an overall
organizational strategy. This approach includes an organization-wide diversity
evaluation, or audit, that should lead to goals that are tailored to the
organization’s unique culture and will result in implementing appropriate
diversity policies and practices. Based on this evaluation, diversity goals are
then set forth, with the general purpose of creating a more inclusive work
environment and a strategy for achieving organizational outcomes.
An
organization can implement a variety of diversity policies and practices to
create an inclusive work environment at the management and employee levels.
Past research has found that diversity initiatives covered five principal areas
and included: (a) Management
leadership; (b) Education
and training; (c) Performance
and accountability; (d) Work-life
balance, and (e) Career
development and planning.
In
addition to actively recruiting members of diverse groups, the most common
approach to diversity within work organization is to provide sensitivity
training and workshops to employees. Often triggered by lawsuits, diversity
trainings vary from one-hour lectures to series of on-going seminars. These
trainings can use experiential, emotional, and sometimes confrontational
techniques to raise awareness about personal harm caused by “the isms”: racism,
sexism, heterosexism, ageism, and others.
Most
diversity efforts in work organizations focus on management, also important to
develop the awareness and skills of individual employees’ at all organizational
levels. Employees need to learn the skills necessary to becoming effective diversity respondents (those
who act with confidence, wisdom, and effectiveness when interacting with those
who are different from them) and to develop diversity maturity (a combination of diversity knowledge
and a comfort with the dynamics of diversity relationships). Investing in the
development of advanced diversity skills is important not only for the
organization and teamwork among its employees, but also for individuals who
will benefit from improved career trajectories. It is clearly in the best
interest of organizations to elevate their employees’ diversity skills while at
the same time creating an organizational environment that allows all qualified
employees to perform at peak effectiveness.
Barriers
and Benefits of Implementing the Inclusive Approach at Level I
Organizations
that implement inclusive policies and practices may reap benefits both for
individual employees and for the organization as a whole. At the same time,
they will need to overcome barriers on several fronts. (See Figure 13.2 The
Inclusive Workplace: The Practice Model for Level I)
Barriers. The main
barriers have to do with managers’ and employees’ attitudes and behaviors.
Specifically, prejudice (biased views) and discrimination (biased behaviors),
either overt or covert, are at the core of the barriers for implementing
inclusive policies at the workplace. In today’s “politically correct” environment,
people may be embarrassed to show their ignorance about other cultures, may not
want to invest time and energy in learning about those cultures, or may
perceive diversity initiatives as a threat to their job security. The barriers
traditionally suffered by women, older adults, and ethnic/racial minorities
include lack of support in career planning; marginalized status; failure to
give non-traditional employees the breadth of experience required for job
advancement; social isolation, particularly in management positions; and
unsupportive working environment.
Benefits. By enacting
policies that facilitate inclusion of all employees, the employment barriers
traditionally suffered by women and minorities can be overcome. Such policies
open the doors to job advancement and promotions that have clear monetary
benefits to individual employees and their families. They also open up channels
of communication and enhance employees’ decision-making power. There is now
accumulating evidence that the benefits of inclusive diversity practices center
around three areas: (a) the opportunity
to drive business growth and productivity by leveraging the many
facets of diversity such as marketing more effectively to minority communities
or to senior citizens; (b) cost
savings due to lower turnover, less absenteeism, and improved
productivity and winning the
competition for talent by being more attractive to women and
members of minority groups; and (c) the positive effect that diversity
management has on the company’s
image and stock prices.
Case
Illustration: Level I–Inclusion Through Diversity Within Work
Organizations–Denny's, Inc.
Summary. In the
early 1990s, many accounts of denial of service, discrimination, and
mistreatment from African Americans who visited Denny’s came forth. This
generated immense negative publicity at several of its restaurants across the
United States. After paying $54 million to settle a pair of class action
lawsuits, Denny’s has undergone a major transformation to change the level of
diversity within the company as well as to improve the way employees treat
customers. Their efforts have been rewarded with widespread praise and numerous
awards, including Fortune Magazine’s choice as the number one place for
minorities to work.
Homogenous History. Denny’s
started in 1953 as a donut shop and has grown into the largest full-service,
family-style restaurant chain in the United States, with over 1,000 locations.
Denny’s, now an international company, operates in seven countries. A major
stain appeared on Denny’s reputation after two class-action lawsuits for
discrimination were filed in 1993. The cases accused Denny’s (and Denny’s
parent company at the time, Flagstar) of repeated civil rights violations,
primarily against African Americans including:
- Requiring African
Americans to prepay for meals as well as, in some cases, pay a cover
charge before being served.
- “Black out”
periods were instituted at some restaurants, during which time the number
of African American patrons was limited.
- Denny’s denied
complimentary “birthday meals” for African Americans or, in some cases,
required burdensome proof of a child’s age. This was the case for the
Thompson family who was denied a birthday meal for their daughter on her
thirteenth birthday.
- Denny’s sometimes
forced the removal of African Americans from its restaurants. Employees
would then claim the customer was being hostile.
- The problem was
systemic, as evidenced by other practices. Denny’s had only one African
American franchisee and had no minority suppliers in the early 1990s.
Denny’s board of directors consisted almost exclusively of White men.
Initially
Jerry Richardson, the CEO of Denny’s parent company, Flagstar, denied and
fought the charges filed in the lawsuits. Faced with growing negative
publicity, Richardson signed a pact with the NAACP in 1993 to help solve the
company’s problems. He agreed to hire more minorities and increase the number
of purchases from minority-owned businesses. Despite these efforts, evidence
continued to mount eventually causing Denny’s to settle the lawsuits.
Denny’s
losses from the lawsuits ($54 million to settle the class action lawsuits) and
widespread negative publicity (many customers refused to patronize the
restaurant) were significant.
Additionally,
Denny’s had to absorb operational expenses associated with its class-action
settlement. Under the consent decree from the settlement, Denny’s was required
to perform a variety of activities for seven years, including retaining a civil
rights monitor, developing and administering a nondiscrimination training
program, providing mandatory training for every employee of Denny’s and Denny’s
franchises, testing franchise and company-owned restaurants to ensure
compliance with the consent decree, and notifying the public that Denny’s will
operate in a nondiscriminatory manner.
The New Face of Denny’s. To
change its behavior and image, Denny’s parent company, Flagstar, hired a new
CEO, Jim Adamson, in 1995. Adamson had a history of reversing bad company
positions and also possessed a unique diversity perspective due to his heritage
and childhood. Adamson created a chief diversity officer position and recruited
Rachelle Hood-Phillips to serve in that role. Her career involved successfully
building and managing diversity at Fortune 500 companies. Adamson also began to
denounce discrimination at employee meetings and other events.
Diversity Changes. Together,
Hood-Phillips and Adamson implemented many changes to improve Denny’s diversity
beyond the consent decree, including: employing methods to effectively measure
and track diversity at Denny’s; introducing initiatives to link diversity to a
manager’s bonus; and instituting diversity trainings that taught employees how
to empathize with customers. Denny’s spent several million dollars each year on
compliance and training. The training was so effective that Denny’s was
released from the oversight of its civil rights monitor at the end of 1999, a
year earlier than mandated by consent decree. However, Denny’s continues to
investigate every incident or claim of discrimination.
In
addition to all of the training that Denny’s provides, they have also made
substantial improvements in the diversity of employees. In the early 1990s, the
board was composed primarily of white men; by 2012 40% of the 10 board members
were women or minorities. Throughout all levels of the organization, the change
in diversity is evident—38% of managers are women or minorities, and 61% of all
Denny’s employees are women or minorities.
As
of 2015, 3 out of 10 board members are women. Also in 2015, Denny’s started a
Women’s Leadership Group creating an internal network of women leaders.
Denny’s
has also increased the number of minority franchise owners from 1 in the early
1990s to 120 in 2002 (which represent 46% of all Denny’s restaurants). As of
2015, 64.1% of Denny’s total workforce represents underrepresented groups.
Forty-five percent of total restaurants are minority owned, 5% by LGBT owners,
and 16% by women. Denny’s has also increased its purchases from minority-owned
suppliers from $0 in 1992 to $90 million in 2002, representing 15% of Denny’s
annual purchases—4 times the national average. As of 2015, 13.1% of total
spending goes to minority and women-owned suppliers.
Denny’s
has been active with philanthropic activities, supporting numerous human and
civil rights organizations. Lastly, in order to let the public know about all
of the changes and recapture some of its lost customer base, Denny’s spent
several million dollars on an ad campaign targeting minority customers.
Awards and Impact. The
efforts at Denny’s have been noticed by numerous organizations. Denny’s has won
awards for being a friendly place for women and minorities to eat and work. The
most significant awards that recognize Denny’s achievements are from Fortune
magazine and the NAACP.
Continued Legal Trouble. Despite
the changes made at Denny’s, legal trouble persists. Denny’s has found itself
being the subject of numerous lawsuits since the 1993 class-action cases. The
claims were familiar—denial of service, mistreatment, racial slurs, and other
discrimination practices. Denny’s has also faced sexual harassment and
discrimination charges from at least one employee. In 2011, Denny’s settled
with the EEOC for $1.4M for a disability-based lawsuit brought by a former
manager and dozens of former employees. Finally, in 2015, a New Mexico based
gay-pride group claimed a Deming, New Mexico Denny’s discriminated against them
because of their sexual orientation.
Questions for Discussion and Further Analysis
6.
Could Denny’s have
managed their diversity issues better? Why or why not?
7.
Why do you think
Denny’s is facing continued discrimination lawsuits? Do the lawsuits indicate
that Denny’s policies and practices are not working? Are there other
explanations? If you were a consultant, what would you advise the company to do
at this point?
8.
Jim Adamson stated that
he would fire anyone who discriminated or challenged his new policies. What
message did this statement send to the employees? What impact do you think it
had on employee morale and customer relations?
9.
Was Jim Adamson
effective in improving Denny’s diversity and public image? Why or why not?
Summary
and Conclusion
This
chapter presents level I of the inclusive workplace model: inclusion through
diversity within the workplace. A variety of policies and practices constitute
inclusion at this level—from recruitment, through mentoring and training, to
cultural audit and linking diversity practices to strategic goals. The main
barriers to implementing inclusive policies at this level are attitudes and
behaviors of prejudice and discrimination within the company. These barriers
include lack of support in career planning, failure to give nontraditional
employees the breadth of experience required for job advancement, and a lonely
and unsupportive working environment. The main benefits of inclusive policies
at this level include opportunities to drive business growth and productivity;
cost savings due to lower turnover, less absenteeism, and improved productivity;
and the positive effect diversity management has on the company’s image and
stock price.
Chapter 13 Outline
Chapter
Outline
I. Chapter
Overview—Level I
a. The
first level of the Inclusive Workplace, diversity within work organizations, relates to the
organization’s internal relations with its own employees and reflects the
“micro” system level within the organizations: that of individuals and groups.
b. While
an exclusionary workplace is based on the perception that all workers need to
conform to pre-established organizational values and norms (determined by its
“main stream”), the inclusive work place is based on a pluralistic value frame
that relies on mutual respect and equal contributions from different cultural
perspectives to the organization’s values and norms.
c. In
this chapter, we present Level I of the Inclusive Workplace model: Inclusion
Through Diversity Within the Work Organization. Inclusive policies and
practices applied to Level I are discussed.
d. We
also address the barriers and benefits to implementing such an approach.
Lastly, we present a case illustration and questions for further discussion.
II. Inclusive
Policies and Practices
a. A
variety of policies and practices constitute inclusion at Level I—from
recruitment, through mentorship and training, to cultural audits and linking
diversity practices to strategic goals.
b. What
distinguishes an inclusive workplace from an organization that merely
implements diversity initiatives is the comprehensive approach to diversity
that is part of an overall organizational strategy.
c. This
approach includes an organization-wide diversity evaluation, or audit, that
should lead to goals that are tailored to the organization’s unique culture and
will result in implementing appropriate diversity policies and practices.
i. The cultural audit is usually
performed by outside consultants who obtain data from surveys and focus groups
to identify areas in which employees who are different from the dominant group
feel that they are blocked from performing to the best of their ability.
ii. Based
on this assessment, diversity goals are then set forth, with the general
purpose of creating a more inclusive work environment and as a strategy for
achieving organizational outcomes.
d. In
this section, we discuss a variety of diversity policies and practices that an
organization can implement to create an inclusive work environment.
i. Management leadership—senior
management taking leadership in major diversity projects such as using
consultants to conduct needs assessment and designing diversity training
programs;
ii. Education and training—conducting
seminars and workshops to increase diversity awareness and skill building, and
to help employees understand the need for, and meaning of, valuing diversity;
iii. Performance and accountability—developing
diversity action plans to meet the goals of specific business units and of the
organization and holding managers accountable by linking diversity performance
to compensation;
iv. Work-life balance—offering
flexible work arrangements to accommodate diverse needs and life styles of
employees; and,
v. Career development and planning—establishing
career development and planning initiatives for women and members of
underrepresented groups to ensure fair promotion and to increase diversity
representation in managerial-level jobs.
vi. In
addition to actively recruiting members of diverse groups, the most common
approach to diversity within work organizations is to provide sensitivity
training and workshops to employees.
1. Often
triggered by lawsuits, diversity trainings vary from one-hour lectures to a
series of on-going seminars.
2. They
often use experiential, emotional, and sometimes confrontational techniques to
raise awareness about personal harm caused by “the ‘isms’”: racism, sexism,
heterosexism, ageism, and others.
vii. Other
efforts to promote diversity and inclusion within organizations include
initiatives aimed at:
1. Establishing
organizational responsibility such as appointing a corporate officer to oversee
the company’s diversity efforts and appointing appointing/electing diversity
committees comprised of employees from various departments and levels;
2. Encouraging
managers’ responsibility for diversity through such mechanisms as evaluating
managers on their diversity performances; and
3. Empowering
employees of diverse backgrounds through networking and mentorship programs.
viii. It
is important to develop the awareness and skills of individual employees at all
organizational levels. Individual employees should learn how to
1. become effective diversity respondents—people
who act with confidence, wisdom, and effectiveness when interacting with others
who may be significantly different from them.
2. develop diversity maturity that is a
combination of knowledge about diversity and a comfort with the dynamics of
diversity relationships.
ix. Investing
in the development of advanced diversity skills is important not only for
organizations that will benefit from improved relations and better team work
among its employees, but also for individuals who will benefit from improved
career trajectories.
x. It
is in the best interest of organizations to elevate their employees’ diversity
skills while at the same time creating an organizational environment that
allows all qualified employees to perform at peak effectiveness.
III. Barriers
and Benefits of Implementing the Inclusive Approach at Level I.
a. Barriers
i. The
main barriers have to do with managers’ and employees’ attitudes and behavior.
1. Prejudice
(biased views) and discrimination (biased behaviors), either overt or covert,
are at the core of the barriers for implementing inclusive policies at the work
place.
2. In
today’s “politically correct” environment, people may be embarrassed to show
their ignorance about other cultures, may not want to invest time and energy in
learning about those cultures, or may perceive diversity initiatives as a threat
to their job security.
ii. The
barriers traditionally suffered by women, older adults, and ethnic/racial
minorities include:
1. lack
of support in career planning;
2. marginalized
status;
3. failure
to give nontraditional employees the breadth of experience required for job
advancement; and,
4. social
isolation, particularly in management positions, and an unsupportive working
environment.
b. Benefits
i. By
enacting policies that facilitate inclusion of all employees, the employment
barriers traditionally suffered by women and traditionally disadvantaged groups
can be overcome.
1. Diversity
practices open the doors to job advancement and promotions that have clear
monetary benefits to individual employees and their families.
2. They
also open up channels of communication and enhance employees’ decision-making
power.
ii. Research
into the benefits of diversity practices has been generated in recent years,
focusing on the following:
1. clearly
defining and measuring diversity; and
2. examining
the causal connection between diversity management and organizational outcomes
iii. Accumulating
evidence of the benefits of inclusive diversity practices center around three
areas:
1. the opportunity to drive business growth and
productivity by leveraging the many facets of diversity such as
marketing more effectively to minority communities or to senior citizens;
2. cost savings due
to lower turnover, less absenteeism, and improved productivity and winning the competition for talent by
being more attractive to women and members of minority groups; and
3. the
positive effect that diversity management has on the company’s image and stock prices.
IV. Case
Illustration: Level I—Inclusion Through Diversity Within Work
Organizations—Denny’s, Inc.
a. Overview
of the Denny’s case.
i. In
the early 1990s, Denny’s, once famous for its breakfast menu, became famous for
its discrimination, generating immense negative publicity for denying service
to African Americans at several of its restaurants across the United States.
ii. In
addition to discriminating against its minority customers, Denny’s purchased no
supplies from minorities and had few minorities in its management.
iii. After
paying $54 million to settle a pair of class action lawsuits, Denny’s has
undergone a major transformation to change the level of diversity within the
company as well as improving the way employees treat customers.
iv. Their
efforts have been rewarded with widespread praise and numerous awards,
including Fortune Magazine’s choice as the number one place for minorities to
work.
v. Despite
all of these changes, Denny’s still faces a negative public image and continual
lawsuits for discrimination.
b. Homogenous
History.
i. Denny’s
started in 1953 as a donut shop and has now grown into the largest
full-service, family-style restaurant chain in the United States, with over
1,000 locations. Denny’s became an international company in 1969 and now
operates in seven countries, including the United States.
ii. A
major stain appeared on Denny’s reputation after two class-action lawsuits for
discrimination were filed in 1993 (Ridgeway
v. Flagstar Corporation and Denny’s, Inc. Civ. No. 93-20202-JW
and United States of America v.
Flagstar Corporation and Denny’s, Inc. Civ. No. 93-20208-JW).
iii. The
cases accused Denny’s (and Denny’s parent company at the time, Flagstar) of
repeated civil rights violations, primarily against African Americans.
1. They
required African Americans to prepay for meals as well as, in some cases, pay a
cover charge before being served.
2. “Black-out”
periods were instituted at some restaurants, during which time the number of
African American patrons was limited.
3. Denny’s
denied complimentary “birthday meals” for African Americans, or in some cases,
required burdensome proof of a child’s age. This was the case for the Thompson
family who was denied a birthday meal for their daughter on her 13thbirthday.
4. Denny’s
sometimes forced the removal of African Americans from its restaurants.
Employees would then claim the customer was being hostile.
5. The
problem was systemic, as evidenced by other practices. Denny’s had only one
African American franchisee and had no minority suppliers in the early 1990s.
Denny’s board of directors consisted almost exclusively of white men.
iv. Denny’s
response to the charges
1. Initially,
Jerry Richardson, the CEO of Denny’s parent company, Flagstar, denied and
fought the charges filed in the lawsuits.
2. Faced
with growing negative publicity, Richardson signed a pact with the NAACP in
1993 to help solve the company’s problems.
3. Despite
these efforts, evidence continued to mount, eventually causing Denny’s to
settle the lawsuits resulting in tremendous losses:
a. Denny’s
paid $54 million to settle the class action lawsuits.
b. Many
customers refused to patronize Denny’s.
c. Denny’s
had to absorb operational expenses associated with its class-action settlement.
Under the consent decree from the settlement, Denny’s was required to perform
the following activities for seven years, starting May 24, 1994
i. Retain
a civil rights monitor, a person experienced with the monitoring and
enforcement of civil rights;
ii. Develop
and administer a non-discrimination training program;
iii. Test
franchise and company-owned restaurants to ensure compliance with the consent
decree; and
iv. Notify
the public that Denny’s will operate in a nondiscriminatory manner.
c. The
New Face of Denny’s.
i. To
meet the challenge of changing its behavior and image, Denny’s parent company,
Flagstar, and their newly hired CEO, Jim Adamson, implemented several
organizational changes.
1. One
of Adamson’s first steps was to create a chief diversity officer position. He
recruited Rachelle Hood-Phillips, with whom he worked at Burger King, to fill
the role. Hood-Phillips had spent her career successfully building and managing
diversity at Fortune 500 companies.
2. Adamson
denounced discrimination at employee meetings and other events. He publicly
warned that he would fire any employee or franchise owner who discriminated or
challenged the diversity changes he implemented.
d. Diversity
Changes.
i. Together
Hood-Phillips and Adamson implemented many changes to improve Denny’s diversity
beyond the consent decree.
1. Hood-Phillips
developed methods to effectively measure and track diversity at Denny’s. Her
work enabled Adamson to tie diversity to a manager’s bonus.
2. The
implemented diversity training may represent some of the company’s best efforts
to correct its diversity issues.
a. The
training teaches employees how to empathize with customers.
b. More
importantly, employees are taught how to reflect their empathy back to the
customer and show their concern about a problem.
c. Every
employee must attend a diversity training session within 75 days of employment
and a second session within 225 days.
d. Denny’s
spends several million dollars each year on compliance and training.
e. The
training was so effective that Denny’s was released from the oversight of its
civil rights monitor at the end of 1999, a year earlier than mandated by
consent decree.
f. Denny’s
continues to investigate every incident or claim of discrimination.
3. Denny’s
has also made substantial improvements in the diversity of employees and
franchise owners.
a. Board
of Directors
i. In
the early 1990s, the board was composed primarily of white men; by 2012, 40% of
board were women or minorities, and in 2015, 3 of 10 board members are women.
b. Employees
i. In
2015, created a Women’s Leadership Group to create an internal network of women
leaders
ii. Throughout
all levels of the organization, the change in diversity is evident:
1. 38%
of management are women or minorities, and
2. 64.1%
of all Denny’s employees are minorities.
c. Franchise
owners
i. The
number of minority franchise owners increased from 1 in the early 1990s to 120
in 2002, representing 46% of all Denny’s restaurants.
ii. Because
the franchisees, on average, own more than one restaurant, the minority
franchisees own a total of 472 restaurants, which represents 46% of all Denny’s
restaurants In 2015, 45% are minority owned.
iii. In
many cases, Denny’s has provided funding to help minority owners get started.
4. Denny’s
has increased its purchases from minority-owned suppliers from $0 in 1992 to
$90 million in 2002, representing 15% of Denny’s annual purchases—four times
the national average. In 2015, 13.1% of TOTAL spending goes to minority and
women-owned suppliers.
5. In
addition to changing its business practices, Denny’s has been active with
philanthropic activities, supporting numerous human and civil rights
organizations.
6. To
let the public know about all of the changes and recapture some of its lost customer-base,
Denny’s spent several million dollars on an ad campaign targeting minority
customers.
e. Awards
and Impact.
i. The
efforts at Denny’s have been noticed by numerous organizations. Denny’s has won
awards for being a friendly place for women and minorities to eat and work.
ii. Awards
have come from Family
Digest magazine, The National Association for Female
Executives, Asian
Enterprise magazine, Latina
Style magazine, and The Center for Responsibility in Business.
iii. The
most significant awards that recognize Denny’s achievements are from Fortune magazine and the NAACP.
iv. Denny’s
efforts have also resulted in increased business.
f. Continued
Legal Trouble.
i. Denny’s
has continued to find themselves the subject of numerous lawsuits since the 1993
class-action cases with familiar claims—denial of service, mistreatment, racial
slurs and other discrimination practices.
ii. Denny’s
has also faced sexual harassment and discrimination charges from at least one
employee (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2002).
iii. 2011,
disability-based lawsuit
iv. 2015,
sexual orientation-based lawsuit
g. Questions
for Discussion and Further Analysis
i. Could
Denny’s have managed their diversity issues better? Why or why not?
ii. Why
do you think Denny’s is facing continuing discrimination lawsuits? Do the
lawsuits indicate that Denny’s policies and practices are not working? Are
there other explanations? If you were a consultant, what would you advise the
company to do at this point?
iii. Jim
Adamson stated that he would fire anyone who discriminated or challenged his
new policies. What message did this statement send to the employees? What
impact do you think it had on employee morale and customer relations?
iv. Was
Jim Adamson effective in improving Denny’s diversity and public image? Why or
why not?
h. Summary
and Conclusion
i. This
chapter presents level I of the inclusive workplace model: inclusion through
diversity within the workplace.
ii. A
variety of policies and practices constitute inclusion at level I—from
recruitment, through mentoring and training, to cultural audit and linking
diversity practices to strategic goals.
iii. The
main barriers to implementing inclusive policies at this level are attitudes
and behaviors of prejudice and discrimination within the company. These
barriers include lack of support in career planning, failure to give
nontraditional employees the breadth of experience required for job
advancement, and a lonely and unsupportive working environment.
iv. The
main benefits of inclusive policies at this level include opportunities to
drive business growth and productivity; cost savings due to lower turnover,
less absenteeism, and improved productivity; and the positive effect diversity
management has on the company’s image and stock price.
Question Attachments
2 attachments —