Question Details

PAD 530 Week 4 DISCUSSION 1
“Affirmative Action and the Law” Please respond to the following:
	Analyze the Bakke and the University of Michigan rulings and discuss two implications these court rulings have on you as the personnel manager of your agency.
	Debate It: Take a position for or against the U.S. Supreme Court- decision in 1986 on the use of affirmative action in hiring, promotion, and layoffs for your agency. Provide at two reasons and examples to support your position.
Class, use this format to respond to this Discussion:
Note that this response will require a total of seven (5) items.
Analyze the Bakke and the University of Michigan rulings and discuss two implications these court rulings have on you as the personnel manager of your agency.
Implication 1: (Place your response here!)
Implication 2: (Place your response here!)
 
Debate It: Take a position for or against the U.S. Supreme Court- decision in 1986 on the use of affirmative action in hiring, promotion, and layoffs for your agency. (Place your response here!)
Provide at two reasons and examples to support your position.
Reason/Example 1: (Place your response here!)
Reason/Example 2: (Place your response here!)

Public Administration Help, Public Administration Homework help, Public Administration Study Help, Public Administration Course Help