BUS 206 Week 4 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | southern-new-hampshire-university
- southern-new-hampshire-university / BUS 206
- 24 Aug 2020
- Price: $8
- Other / Other
BUS 206 Week 4 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | southern-new-hampshire-university
4-1
Discussion
Choose
one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to elaborate and explain.
·
Show Me My Money (Reisenfeld & Company v. The
Network Group Inc., p. 321)
Why
does the court see this case as involving a quasi-contract as opposed to an
actual contract? What other case law does the court rely on in finding
precedent/support for compensating Reisenfeld? Does this decision appear to
follow the golden rule guideline set forth in Chapter 2 (pp. 27 and 28)?
Describe another example of an implied-in-fact or quasi-contract that you have
experienced or is mentioned in the text.
·
Designer Baby (Scalisi vs. NY Univ. Medical Center,
p. 429)
Why was the
basis of the parent’s argument that they were not bound by the written contract
in the Scalisi et al. v. New York University Medical Center case? How did the
court rule and what was the reasoning for that decision. Do you agree or
disagree. Why or why not? Have you ever entered into an oral contract?
Discuss.
To complete this
assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.
USA 
India