JUS 261 Week 5 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | southern-new-hampshire-university
- southern-new-hampshire-university / JUS 261
- 30 Jul 2020
- Price: $8
- Other / Other
JUS 261 Week 5 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | southern-new-hampshire-university
5-1
Discussion: Balancing Justice and Judicial Efficiency
Litigants in court cases are seeking
justice. In a civil case, one side may have been severely injured in an
accident and is seeking monetary damages to pay doctor’s bills and make up for
lost income. Or, a small-business owner who was not paid for products that she
delivered to a customer may be forced to close her shop and go into bankruptcy
if the court does not swiftly order the other side to pay her. In a criminal
case, a victim and the community are seeking closure and safety, while the
defendant is seeking a fair hearing and a return to freedom, if he or she is
innocent.
Judges, court clerks/managers, and the
taxpaying public are seeking judicial efficiency. They want cases to move
swiftly through the courts with minimal delays and expenses.
Carefully read the module resources before
posting in this topic.
In your initial post, identify the main
point or technique from the readings that you believe demonstrates a means of
ensuring judicial efficiency while protecting the process of securing justice
for litigants. Describe the point or technique, and explain how it balances
justice and judicial efficiency. For example, you might state that the federal
electronic case-filing system promotes justice because it is fast, and reason
that since it does not require paper or rooms full of filing drawers in the
clerk’s office, it is more economical.
In response to your peers, challenge their
positions; argue how the point they described might impede or slow the pursuit
of justice. Defend your position by explaining how that point might hurt
someone in a civil or criminal case. For example, you might argue that the
federal electronic case-filing system is complicated and requires computer
equipment and knowledge that poor and elderly litigants may not have.