ASCI 404 Week 3 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | ERAU
- embry-riddle-aeronautical-university / ASCI 404
- 08 Jan 2020
- Price: $8
- Other / Other
ASCI 404 Week 3 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | ERAU
3.2 Discussion:
Liability
While
performing an engine overhaul on a customer’s single-engine aircraft, an
A&P mechanic employed by an FAA-certified aircraft repair station is
distracted by a telephone call. Returning to the nearly-completed task, the mechanic
replaces the engine cowling without first securing the oil sump drain plug with
safety wire, as required by the maintenance manual. The shop foreman, who holds
FAA Inspection Authorization, signs off the overhaul and approves the aircraft
for return to service without noticing the oversight. The owner-pilot picks up
the aircraft and takes off for an engine break-in flight. While in flight, the
drain plug vibrates loose, the engine oil is lost overboard and the engine
seizes. The pilot makes an emergency landing in what looks like the most
suitable spot within gliding range, a plowed field, where the aircraft
overturns. The aircraft is substantially damaged and the pilot is seriously
injured.
Who is potentially legally liable for these damages and injuries,
and why?
Option 2
A pilot
had always dreamed of flying the Alaska bush, but that dream had been
sidetracked by the responsibilities to earn a living adequate to support a
family. Now that the family had emptied the nest, the pilot was able to buy a
brand-new short takeoff and landing (STOL) tailwheel bush plane from a local
dealer, practice short and soft field landings, take a few months off work,
load up the hunting, fishing, and camping gear and head out to fulfill that
dream. While making a picture-perfect landing on a gravel bar in an Alaskan
river, one of the airplane’s left main landing gear struts collapsed, causing
the aircraft to be wrecked, and the pilot seriously injured. The gear collapse
was caused by a metallurgical flaw in the strut, which had been manufactured by
a subcontractor of the aircraft’s manufacturer. The flaw was present when the
subcontractor delivered the part to the manufacturer.
Who is potentially legally liable for the pilot’s injuries, and
why? Could it make a difference if the pilot had bought the airplane a long
time before the accident? Explain.
Option 3
Renting an
aircraft from a fixed-base operator (FBO), a college student who is a private
pilot heads out on a cross-country trip to spend Thanksgiving at home, bringing
along a non-pilot friend. Due to a later than planned start, the two arrive
later than anticipated at the last planned fuel stop at a rural airport, only
to find the FBO closed and the fuel pumps locked. A cell phone call to the
FBO’s number yields a recorded message that the business is closed for the
holiday weekend. Estimating that at least an hour’s fuel remains in the
aircraft’s tanks, the pilot takes off again, planning to refuel at the next
airport along the route. Unfortunately, the pilot’s estimate proves wrong and
the aircraft runs out of fuel on approach to the next airport. In the dark, the
pilot lands short of the runway and the airplane is destroyed, and the
passenger is seriously injured, though the pilot escapes with minor scrapes and
bruises.
Is the pilot legally liable for the passenger’s injuries and to
the FBO for destroying its airplane? Explain.
Reply
Respond critically and analytically, but
politely and professionally, to at least two of your classmates’ posts. At
least one of your replies must be to a scenario other than the ones you chose
to answer. Express your agreement or disagreement with their analyses and
clearly state your reasons.
https://erau.instructure.com/courses/92021/files/17173821/download