PSY 304 Week 5 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Ashford University
- ashford university / PSY 304
- 06 Nov 2019
- Price: $8
- Other / Other
PSY 304 Week 5 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Ashford University
Week 5 - Discussion
Aging Successfully
Prior to completing
this discussion read Chapter 16: A Thoughtful Approach to Life: Aspects of
Successful Aging in Understanding Development: A Lifespan
Perspective, the course textbook that is required reading for this week.
https://ashford.instructure.com/courses/52123/files/10185550/preview
Mossler and Ziegler
(2019) suggest numerous variables that attribute to successful aging: selection
processes [Selection, optimization, and compensation theory (SOC)]; engagement
with life, avoiding disease and disability, and high cognitive and physical
functioning [Rowe and Kahn’s (1997) Model of Successful
Aging]; psychosocial strengths (family and friends), and even
specific predictors such as “a stable marriage by age 50 (positive relationships),
[a] college education, using mature adaptations, not smoking or quitting at a
young age, not abusing alcohol, regular exercise, and a healthy weight”
(Mossler & Ziegler, 2019, section 16.2).
Before you submit your discussion, you are encouraged to review
the Writing Center’s Grammarly (Links to an external site.)page, which
includes a link to The Grammarly Guide (Links to an external site.), set up a Grammarly account (if you have not
already done so), and use Grammarly to review a rough draft of your assignment.
Then, carefully review all issues identified by Grammarly and revise your work
as needed.
In your initial post,
address the following:
·
Based on these
numerous factors, what variables do you consider to be most important, from
your own experiences (self, vicarious, or fictional) to successful aging?
·
Why? Support your
assertions with known experiences and information you have learned throughout
the course. Share only information that you are comfortable with.
Peer Responses: Review several of your classmates’ posts.
Provide a substantive response to at least two of your peers, in a minimum of
300 words. Based on your own reading and experiences, add important information
to the conversation. Clearly and elaborately provide valuable information to
each peer’s original postings.
Instructor Responses: Review any instructor feedback on your
postings. Often feedback is shared to help you to elevate your level of
critical thought or make corrections. Reply based on this feedback to advance
your understanding of the content addressed.
Continue to monitor this discussion through
5:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) on Day 7 of the week. Comment on at least one of your
classmates’ responses to your initial post.
Remember that our forums should be conversations; the dialogue is
encouraged throughout this course. Your grade will reflect the quality of your
initial post, the depth of your peer replies, and your active support of forum
dialogue.
Observe the following guidelines for all
responses:
·
Remember that our
forums should be conversations; the dialogue is encouraged throughout this course.
Your grade will reflect the quality of your initial post, the depth of your
peer replies, and your active support of forum dialogue.
·
Provide a courteous
and an interactive learning environment.