NR 500 Week 1 Discussion 1 | chamberlain university
- chamberlain university / NR 500
- 18 Oct 2021
- Price: $7
- Healthcare Assignment Help / Nursing Assignment Help
NR 500 Week 1 Discussion 1 | chamberlain university
Week 1: The Value of a Master's-Prepared Nurse
Purpose
The purpose
of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and
students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing,
integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced
nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well
as professional communication are required. Application of
information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of
principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life
professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and
students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas,
perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the
student will demonstrate the ability to:
- Examine roles and competencies of advanced practice
nurses essential to performing as leaders and advocates of holistic, safe,
and quality care (CO1)
- Apply concepts of person-centered care to nursing
practice situations (CO2)
- Analyze essential skills needed to lead within the
context of complex systems (CO3)
- Explore the process of scholarship engagement to
improve health and healthcare outcomes in various settings (CO4)
Due
Date
A 10% late penalty will be imposed
for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the
number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e.
student will receive an automatic 0 for any portion of the discussion not
posted by that time). Week 8 discussion closes on Saturday at 11:59pm MT.
NOTE: To receive credit for a
week's discussion, students may
begin posting no earlier than
the Sunday immediately before each
week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most
weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week's
assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59
p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at
11:59 p.m. MT Saturday.
A zero is the lowest score that
a student can be assigned.
Faculty may submit any collaborative
discussion posting to Turnitin in order to verify originality.
Total
Points Possible: 75
Requirements:
Discussion
Criteria
I. Application of Course
Knowledge: of Course Knowledge:
The
student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from
personal experience or examples from the
healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the
week in addition to providing personal or professional examples.
The student must completely answer the entire initial question.
II. Engagement in Meaningful
Dialogue: I. The student responds to a
student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
a. Peer Response: The student responds substantively to
at
least one topic-related post by a student peer.
A substantive post adds
content or insights or asks a question that will add
to the learning experience and/or
generate discussion.
- A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other
student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of
shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
- The peer response must occur on a separate day from the
initial posting.
- The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m.
MT.
- The peer response does not require a scholarly citation
and reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes
are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
Faculty Response: The student
responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty
question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire
class.
- A post of "I agree" with a repeat of the
faculty's post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of
shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
- The faculty response must occur on a separate day from
the initial posting.
- Responses to the faculty member must occur by Sunday,
11:59 p.m. MT.
- This response does not require a scholarly citation and
reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are
used, in which APA style standards then apply.
III. Integration of Evidence: The student post provides support from a minimum of one
scholarly in-text citation with a matching reference AND assigned
readings OR online lessons, per discussion topic per week.
- What is a scholarly resource? A scholarly resource is
one that comes from a professional, peer-reviewed publication (e.g.,
journals and government reports such as those from the FDA or CDC).
- Contains references for sources cited
- Written by a professional or scholar in the field and
indicates credentials of the author(s)
- Is no more than 5 years old for clinical or research
article
- What is not considered a scholarly resource?
- Newspaper articles and layperson literature (e.g., Readers
Digest, Healthy Life Magazine, Food, and Fitness)
- Information from Wikipedia or any wiki
- Textbooks
- Website homepages
- The weekly lesson
- Articles in healthcare and nursing-oriented trade
magazines, such as Nursing Made Incredibly Easy and RNMagazine (Source:
What is a scholarly article.docx; Created 06/09 CK/CL Revised: 02/17/11,
09/02/11 nlh/clm)
- Can the lesson for the week be used as a scholarly
source?
- Information from the weekly lesson can be cited in a
posting; however, it is not to be the sole source used in the post.
- Are resources provided from CU acceptable sources
(e.g., the readings for the week)?
- Not as a sole source within the post. The textbook
and/or assigned (required) articles for the week can be used, but another
outside source must be cited for full credit. Textbooks are not
considered scholarly sources for the purpose of discussions.
- Are websites acceptable as scholarly resources for
discussions?
- Yes, if they are documents or data cited from credible
websites. Credible websites usually end in .gov or .edu; however, some
.org sites that belong to professional associations (e.g., American Heart
Association, National League for Nursing, American Diabetes Association)
are also considered credible websites. Websites ending with .com are not
to be used as scholarly resources
IV. Professionalism in
Communication: The post presents information in
logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, and is clearly relevant to
the discussion topic. Grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate.
V. Wednesday Participation
Requirement: The student provides a substantive
response to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course
faculty (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
VI. Total Participation Requirement: The student provides at least three substantive posts (one
to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a
faculty question) on two different days during the week.
DISCUSSION CONTENT |
|||
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
Application of Course Knowledge |
20 |
27 |
Answers the initial discussion
question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the
concepts for the week. |
Engagement in Meaningful
Dialogue With Peers and Faculty |
20 |
27 |
Responds to a student peer AND course
faculty furthering the dialogue by providing more information and
clarification, adding depth to the conversation |
Integration of Evidence |
20 |
27 |
Assigned readings OR online
lesson AND at least one outside scholarly
source are included. The scholarly source is: 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years |
|
60 |
81% |
Total CONTENT
Points= 60 pts |
DISCUSSION FORMAT |
|||
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
Grammar and Communication |
8 |
10 |
Presents information using clear
and concise language in an organized manner |
Reference Citation |
7 |
9 |
References have complete
information as required by APA In-text citations included for
all references AND references included for all
in-text citation |
|
15 |
19% |
Total FORMAT
Points= 15 pts |
|
|
|
DISCUSSION TOTAL=75 points |
Preparing
the Assignment
This discussion will explore the
value of a master's education in nursing. Please provide an initial response to
the discussion question by Wednesday at 11:59pm MT and two interactive dialogue
responses no later than Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of WEEK 1. The
discussion is worth 75 points. Please refer to the discussion grading rubric
for additional criteria.
Consider the current healthcare
delivery models and practice settings. Reflect on how nursing practice is
transforming in response to the current demands of the healthcare system and
answer one of the following questions:
- What differentiates the practice of a master's-prepared
nurse compared to that of a baccalaureate-prepared nurse?
- What is the value of a master's degree in nursing?
- What do you consider to be the most essential
professional competency for a master's-prepared nurse practicing in the
21st century?
Refer to AACN Essentials,
Chamberlain University Nursing Conceptual Framework and other scholarly
sources. Use at least one outside scholarly article to support your position.
Provide an example to illustrate an application to professional practice.
** To view the rubric, please click
on the three dots in the top right