Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Information Technology CapstoneAExperience

Melbourne Polytechnic  Bachelor of Information Technology  CapstoneAExperience 

Client Name and Company Name (either industry or network case study)

NorthLink Industry Partner: Contact Names (To include if applicable) 

Supervisors: 

          Name 1

          Name 2 

Subject Co-ordinator:              Dr Peter Shackleton

Industry Coordinator:              Dr Sita Venkatraman

NS Major Lead Supervisor:     Mr. Michael Gallo

NS Supervisor:                         Dr Tony De Souza-Daw

​ Insert the submission date here in the format 13^thMay, 2021

Instructions:

Purpose of the Post Project Review 

It is important right from the beginning to point out that this is a report on what has been done in the project and what has been learnt from doing the project. To do that you need to ensure that you do two things: compare what you proposed to do versus what you actually did, and reflect on how you went about it. 

A Post Project Review is intended to concisely summarize the outcomes of a project and it is an integral part of the closing stage of a project. A Post Project Review is commonly used to document project successes, problems encountered, lessons learned and performance in order to help an organisation with the management of future projects. 

Over the last year you have written a lot in these subjects and presented on numerous occasions. By now you should be able to prepare a written document in a professional manner. You should be aiming for around 1200 – 1500 words. Make sure to spell and grammar check the document. 

Write in past tense, that is, what you did, not what you are going to do. For that reason, if you take some material from the original plan then you will need to change the tense. 

Finally, remember this is a template. Templates are common in business for clear communication. Do not change the structure or the font size of the document. It could be that you need to put in some subheadings under major sections. That is fine, but make sure to update the Table of Contents. 

Make sure to delete this entire page before submitting this document.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

You saw these instructions in BIT371. You should now know the purpose of an Executive Summary.

There are numerous examples of Executive Summaries and how to write them on the internet. Type “Executive Summary” into Google and you will come up with a number from tertiary institutions. I have replicated the following from Griffiths University.

Writing an Executive Summary

executive summaryAn is usually required for Business, Engineering and Science reports or proposals. 

It is a fully developed mini-version or overview of the Post Project Reviewso it is not merely an introduction. 

An Executive Summary aims to: 

·         provide a brief overview of the whole report so that executives or managers could read the executive summary alone without the accompanying report.

·         allow the reader to quickly understand the information contained in the report persuade the reader that the document is worthy of being read.

·         provide concise, complete, specific and self-sufficient information that can be understood in isolation.   

How to write an Executive Summary 

Note: this is a general summary which refers to reports and plans of different types. Only use what is appropriate.

·         Write the executive summary in your own words, using a formal writing style. Avoid using jargon.

·         purpose/aimState the of the report. For example, the main purpose of this report is to……

·         procedure Describe the that you used. The methodology or analytical process used to process the data collected.

·         resultsProvide the of the study. The major findings may include a number of sentences.

·         recommendationsThe (if applicable) should also be provided.

·         Edit the summary to remove minor points; judgement is required to ensure that the summary is concise. 

·         Remove unnecessary words and sentences. Check accuracy of grammar, spelling, sentence and paragraph structures.

·         Use formatting and graphics to highlight the message. Clarity of the summary can be improved through usage of bullet points and subtitles in the organisational structure. This will also make it easier for the reader to skim read.

·        

Process involved in writing an Executive Summary 

·         The executive summary should be no more than a page in length and should provide an adequate representation of the entire document in a shortened form.

·         The executive summary is provided on a separate page at the beginning of the report before the Table of Contents.

·         An impersonal writing style is used so as to ensure that the report remains formal especially if the audience is your manager or supervisor.

·         At least one sentence is provided for each main section of the report 

·         The key points in the executive summary should be presented in the identical order as they appear in the report so as to encourage logical flow and cohesion.

·         It may be useful to write the executive summary after you have written the whole report so that it more accurately reflects the content of the report. 

·         Avoid recycling sentences or paragraphs from the body of the report as this can be repetitious for the reader.

·         Please check with your lecturer or tutor concerning the word length. Generally, the executive summary can be approximately 10% of the total word length. 

Remember to look at ‘Report Writing’ and ‘Writing in the Third Person’ for more information about making strategic and useful notes.

Further Reading

Business Communication Today. Bovee, C.L., & Thill, J.V.(2005). (8^th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

ContemporaryBusiness Report WritingKuiper, Shirley. (2007). . (3^rd ed.). USA: Thomson South-western. 

External Links

University of Canberra, Academic Skills Centre (2010). , Report Writing http://www.canberra.edu.au.studyskills/writing/reportsI

Central Queensland University, (2010). The abstract/synopsis/executive summary.

http://www.dtls.cqu.edu.au/clc/2_1_4.htmlThe University of Queensland   http://www.uq.edu.au/studentservices/phdwriting/phlink08.html

Additional learning tools / Sources of information 

   See www.griffith.edu.au/library/workshops-training/self-help-resourcesfor further resources to complement this information sheet.

Table of Contents

Title: Insert the Project Title Here

Introduction

Project Background and Justification

Project Objectives

Planned Minimum Viable Product

Summary of Changes to the MVP

Work Completed - The Final MVP

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Conclusion

References

Appendix A: Product Breakdown Structure

Appendix B: Insert the name of the diagram here

Appendix C : Title of Appendix if required

Title: Insert the Project Title Here 

Introduction

Instructions: This section is designed to tell the reader what the Post Project Review is about and to provide a guide to the remaining sections. Tell the reader the structure and what is in the Post Project Review.  It should provide contextual information, that is, relate to the project and the progress you made. 

Again, this is an introduction to the documentand should only provide broad details.  Use words like “The purpose of this document is to report on….” and then “This document covers …”

Project Background and Justification

Instructions: This section is a combination of the background to the project and its justification. 

Start by providing a broad overview of the business and what they do. It does not have to be all that long, however, make sure you set the context for the problem. 

Next, outline the problem or opportunity that the organisation had and thus the reasons for the project. 

While it is possible for you to use some of the material from the backgroundsection from the original project plan, remember to be clear about why this project was undertaken. Your focus should be on describing the problem that the business needed to solve (or opportunity to exploit). 

Project Objectives

Instructions: Clearly outline the objectives of the project. 

By now you should know that objectives are not scope. In addition, objectives need to be SMART and have guided what you created. If you have produced something that is unlikely to fulfil those objectives, then you have produced the wrong system. 

Remember, these are the outcomes of the project not what you produced.

Planned Minimum Viable Product

Instructions: Right from the beginning we emphasised that you had to identify all the work that needed to be done. It set the boundary between what you were expected to do and not do. 

You should outline the initial Minimum Viable Product which was in the project plan. Remember, scope is not just features or components of the system. You had to do a lot more. Again, outline what was originally proposed in scope, that is, what work you expected to do and, if appropriate, the standard that was set (that is, quality).

Summary of Changes to the MVP

Instructions: It is not unusual that the MVP will change, in fact, in an Agile environment with a client focus, change is expected. That said, there is a difference between minor changes to satisfy client requirements, and major changes to scope due to some significatn issue(s). Every project will have some variation albeit small

Start with an outline of the changes to the scope of this project and the reasons for the changes. 

Examine such things as:

·         How the MVP changed over the life of the project – both more functions or less functions

·         How scope change impacted on the project, that is, explain the effect that any approved changes had on the work required and on the Project Plan. 

Outline any things that were expected to be done but were not. Outline any unexpected factors. 

You may have done a basic risk assessment or at least had some idea of the problems that might have existed from the very start.

·         Did they impact?

·         Were there any risks or problems which you felt you could have identified earlier on in the project.

·         What do you feel prevented you from identifying them, or were they unavoidable and unpredictable?

·         What caused it? - your inexperience, communications, client management and so on. This will include requirements, additional work and changes to quality or standards. 

Work Completed - The Final MVP

Instructions: This is a major section in any Post Project Review. It should outline what you completed in the project. How you show what you have done will vary according to the project. It may include screen shots, diagrams, tables and so on to support your outline of the work done. Don’t just put in heaps of screen shots. Put in significant features or components and explain them. Don’t overdo it! 

Focus on the major features, functions or aspects of the system that you completed 

You may wish to put in additional things in an appendix at the end of this document. Again, don’t overdo it! 

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Note: the content of thissection is like a self-reflection but for a group not an individual. Your team should brainstorm on lessons learned to come up with some agreed points.  

Instructions: This too is a vital part of any closing Post Project Review in a project. Although the Post Project Review is used to outline what was done, it is also used to document lessons learned in order to help an organisation with the management of future projects. However, we want you to reflect back on the year-long experience and, with that in mind, outline what you learnt from your experience. 

Summarise the lessons learnt during the project, what went well and what you would do differently next time. Think about the project’s successes (and failures), the areas which you think need to change and outline recommendations you would make for future projects in this area or for students in general. Ask yourself: 

·         What parts of the project went well? Not so well?

·         What do you think could be better?

·         How would you do the development differently?

·         Were there any barriers to success?

·         What techniques and approaches worked and what techniques and approaches didn’t work

·         What steps would you advise members of a similar project to undertake in the future.

Remember to cover both technical competencies (that is your technical skills), project management knowledge and skills, as well as your professional-ready (job ready) skills. The final ones relate to the Graduate Attributes such as oral & written communication, research skills and so on. 

You might even like to make recommendations about the subject, its structure and content.

·         How was it working in a group?

·         What problems/benefits did COVID-19 restrictions create for the project

·         As you know you used an agile/scrum or sprint-based development and reporting methodology this semester. The project was broken into a series of two week sprints. You were to develop products (or deliverables) at each stage. What did you think of this? Did it help with group work?

·         Has your experience in these subjects helped you with your technical knowledge, project management and/or professional skills? 

Conclusion

There are a number of sources on the internet that you can use to help you write a conclusion. One is from Monash University and is at URL http://www.monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/business-economics/marketing/2.2.3.xml                                    

It states:

When you finish writing, leave yourself time to stand back from your report so you can get some perspective on it. Read the whole thing through again, making notes before you start the conclusion.                                                   

There are some important things you need to do in the conclusion:

·         You need to link it to the rest of your Post Project Review.

·         You need to highlight the significant elements from your Post Project Review

·         You need to draw out the main points you want to make about the topic - and make them at a general level.        

You need to avoid introducing new material. 

A conclusion is just that – a summary. I have seen a number ofPost Project Reviews that have a conclusion that has different findings from the introduction, or a conclusion that introduces something completely new. Neither are acceptable      

Summarize what you have said in the Post Project Review in no more than one or two short paragraphs 

References

If you used any references in the preparation of this Post Project Review then you need to cite them using the Harvard style.