MGTU 400 Week 3 | Assignment Help | Brandman University
- brandman-university / MGTU 400
- 23 Apr 2021
- Price: $18
- Management Assignment Help / Business Management Assignment Help
MGTU 400 Week 3 | Assignment Help | Brandman University
MGTU 400 Assignment 3 Handout and Rubric
Individual Assignment 3: Moving White
Collar Jobs
Length: 3-4 pages, double-spaced (Times Roman 12
font with standard 1” margins).
As
with all papers and PowerPoints in this class must use APA see the Sample APA paper
and How to write a Short Paper, found in Course Information.
Due: Week 4 Monday Midnight
Post: Week 3
Assignments folder
This
paper will give you the opportunity to understand how emerging countries are
managing human capital in the tightening global labor market. According to a
2008 McKinsey Global Institute study, countries outside of the United States
are presenting an opportunity for highly qualified, cost-effective alternatives
to US-educated/based professional talent. For instance, Morocco is now home to
offshore centers for French and Spanish companies requiring fluent speakers of
their home languages. Neighboring Tunisia has used its modern infrastructure, business-friendly
regulations, and stable, low-cost workforce to attract companies such as
Siemens. Vietnam offers university graduates who have strong mathematics
skills; speak French, English, German, or Russian; and do not demand high
wages. In choosing a location, companies will have to focus less on low wages and much more on other ways that
candidate cities can fulfill their business needs. They will also have to be
much more rigorous in articulating precisely what they require from an offshore location.
This
paper will allow you to explore answers to the following questions: Should we
move white-collar jobs to offshore environments? With pressures on CEOs and
business leaders of all ranks to increase shareholder value by reducing costs,
one of the options in consideration is the opportunity to move white-collar
professional positions to Outside US. You must have at least three references
(total) to the Hill and Hult (2020) coursebook, the Ascent of Money videos,
your relevant website material, Wall Street Journal, etc. citing using APA. A
minimum of three academic resources should be used in the text – published
books or academic journal articles.
This
paper is designed for you to compare and contrast the pros and cons of moving
white-collar jobs offshore. By comparing the two points of view, you will be
able to better understand how a company chooses (knowingly or unknowingly) to
adopt a particular position and how this decision will affect the economy of
the US and the company that receives the job influx.
Your
paper will consider the following questions:
o What
benefits result from the outsourcing of skilled white collar jobs to developing
nations?
o
Who are the losers?
o Will
developed nations like the US suffer from the loss of skilled and high paying jobs to developing nations? Is
there a difference between the transference of high-paying white collar jobs,
such as computer programming and accounting to developing nations and
low-paying blue- collar jobs?
o If
so, what is the difference, and should government do anything to stop the flow
of white-collar jobs out of the country?
o
Be sure to include your country of
choice as one comparison to the US.
Once
again, you will find very helpful information on any company that you choose on
their Websites and by researching recent press releases. Remember you cannot
use Wikipedia as a source.
Be
sure you have an introduction, an analysis and a conclusion. The following
describes how this paper will be graded. The questions and comments below are
designed for you to read and consider before turning in your work.
Introduction
Does the introduction explain what
the paper is about? Does it give a quick overview of pros and cons analysis?
Analysis
Does
the paper have three to five main points that are supported by references in
the text with page numbers of analyzing all of the variables?
Does
the analyses connect to your introduction and conclusion and the “heart of your
hypothesis?
Conclusion
Is the conclusion a clear and concise recap of the
analysis? The conclusion cannot bring in any new ideas!
Does the conclusion tie into the first
two or three sentences in thought?
Process,
Punctuation and Grammar Are all of the words spelled correctly?
Are the correct words used?
Is the wording smooth to read? Is proper grammar
used?
Does the paper follow APA Guidelines? Is the paper
interesting?