BUS 311 Week 6 assignment Help | Excelsior-college
- excelsior-college / BUS 311
- 04 Mar 2021
- Price: $20
- Management Assignment Help / Organizational Behaviour Assignment help
BUS 311 Week 6 assignment Help | Excelsior-college
M6.4 Case Study: Decision-Making in Crisis
For this assignment, you will be asked to read a case study and
then answer some questions related to the case. This case deals with making
decisions under pressure, especially when information is insufficient.
Before You Begin
Read Sink
or SWIM (downloadable pdf)
or MIT: Sink or SWIM website.
The Case
How could a sunny February afternoon take such a turn for the
worse? The clock ticked in the MIT Sloan Student Life Office (SLO), where the
three Sloan Women in Management (SWIM) club co-presidents and two conference
directors were gathered. SWIM's 3rd annual conference, aptly named "Dare
to Fail: Taking Risks When it Matters Most,” which was 11 months in the making,
had been scheduled to take place the next day. A winter storm was looming, with
weather predictions varying widely from three to 50 inches of snow in the next
48 hours. It was almost 2:00 pm and a decision had to be made – setup was
slated to begin in minutes, and speakers were boarding their flights for
Boston. Should the conference be canceled, modified, or go forward as planned?
SLO Associate Director Marco Esquandolas looked at the five
women seated in front of him and asked, "Ladies, what is your final
call?"
At 1:30 pm on Thursday, February 7, SWIM's three co-presidents
and two conference directors, who had been in varying states of misalignment
and frustration for so long, met with Marco in his office to sort through their
options. Weather reports had been monitored from different networks. Now, there
was every indication that a storm would hit Boston at some point, but most
networks expected the storm to hit after 12:00 pm on Friday, while others said
it could be as late as Friday night. It was simply too early to tell. The
unprecedented decision before them was whether to cancel the conference for a
potentially monstrous snowstorm when there was not a cloud in the sky or a
snowflake on the ground.
Janet and Merrill collected a status update of where each
speaker was, and when planes would begin taking off toward Boston. They
confirmed that all 15 speakers were unfazed by weather reports and were ready
to attend the conference the next day, regardless of the potential snowstorm.
One had already changed her ticket to fly in earlier to avoid any airport
closings, and a second could not be reached as she was already on a flight from
London.
At precisely 2:00 pm, vendors would begin setting up the venue
and SWIM would be liable for the costs. Further, if MIT closed, the rental fees
would triple from a one-day rental to daily rentals through the weekend, when
the rentals could be picked up. Lea did a back of the envelope calculation and
quickly saw that if the conference was canceled after vendors arrived, the
costs could increase significantly. The catering company had already warned her
that it was too late to cancel the perishable food items that had been prepared
for the conference – it was unclear what percentage of the $13,000 catering
bill would be recoverable. Lea knew what her vote was, but she was curious to
see which way her two co-presidents were leaning.
Rescheduling was not an option for the team. With only three
months left before the conference leadership team graduated it would be
impossible to find a date that worked for all, or even most, of the speakers.
Additionally, because the venue had no availability in March, April, or May, the
team would need to find a new location for a rescheduled conference. They would
in effect be planning an entirely new conference in one-quarter of the time it
took to plan the initial conference. For these reasons, they knew rescheduling
would not work.
The MIT administration had not yet closed the Institute and
would not comment on any possibilities. MIT rarely closed its doors, but if it
did no events would be allowed on campus, including the conference.
·
What would happen if the conference was not canceled, and MIT
closed later that night?
·
What if the conference was canceled, MIT did not close, and the
storm only hit Friday night?
·
What would be the fallout with attendees and corporate sponsors?
·
Would SWIM's reputation be impacted?
·
Would they be able to secure sponsorship funds in the future?
·
What if attendees did show up for the conference? Was there a
risk of them being snowed in?
·
If the team opted to cancel the conference, would they be forced
to give back ticket revenue?
o If
so, how would that affect the bottom line?
·
Could they really give up on the event for which they had
sacrificed and devoted a significant amount of time?
The entire conference revolved around the theme of coming to the
brink of failure and still finding a way to succeed. With graduation around the
corner, there would be no second chances.
Given that most weather forecasts suggested that snowfall would
only begin at 12:00 pm Friday, and would not escalate until early evening,
Merrill began championing the idea of a half-day conference.
·
Could they run the events concurrently instead of sequentially,
giving attendees the option to choose which speaker to hear?
·
Since the event space would be set up for one speaker at a time,
would it even be feasible?
·
Would attendees show up for a conference that only lasted three
hours?
o If
not, would low attendance be disrespectful to the high-profile speakers?
The conference directors and co-presidents narrowed it down to
three choices:
1. Cancel
the conference before 2:00 pm, thus saving operational costs that would
otherwise be incurred.
2. Hold
a half-day conference with concurrent speakers.
3. Having
more accurate forecasts and updates on speaker travel plans, wait until
Thursday night to decide.
In his facilitator role, Marco Esquandolas remained an impartial
observer, telling them,
The way I look at clubs on campus is that it is your chance to
practice management. You put this all together. You know best if you should
cancel or go forward. In all my years here, this situation is unprecedented. If
it is canceled, it will be devastating. If there is a storm, it will be
devastating. If there is no storm, it will be devastating. I will support
whatever decision you make.
The women discussed their options at a rapid pace, knowing the
minutes were winding down.
·
How would speakers react if the conference had to be canceled
after they had already flown in?
·
Would companies expect sponsorship money to be returned?
·
What was best for the safety of attendees?
·
How much of the setup cost would be sunk if they postponed the
decision?
·
If first-year students never got to see a conference executed,
what would a cancelation mean for the legacy of SWIM?
·
What alternate venues could accommodate the conference if MIT
closed?
·
Would it even snow?
The only thing they were sure of was that whatever decision they
made would have a long-lasting impact on the event and organization that they
were so dedicated to.
Case
Analysis Instructions
The SWIM team has hired you as a consultant to monitor, analyze,
and make recommendations that would steer the sustainability of the
organization. You have been present during the decision-making process for
their conference. They have asked you to present your assessment and
recommendations. Your report is organized around the following framework.
Section A
1. Identify
areas of strength. Include your reasoning for classifying the areas as
strengths. Offer some suggestions on how they can expand these areas further.
(300 words)
2. Offer
an analysis of their conference process and provide recommendations that would
help improve their process. Provide rationale(s) for your choice(s). (400
words)
3. Identify
3-5 consequences of the resolution(s) you recommend. (300 words)
4. Offer
suggestions on processes SWIM can use to develop contingency plans in the
future? (400 words)
5. Explain
why you believe it is difficult to engage in decision-making in organizations.
(300 words)
Notes for Students
Students who have produced
high-quality essays in the past cover the following:
·
decision-making models,
·
the need for contingency planning, and
·
risk assessment, with details of what that might look like for
this organization.
High-quality essays offer suggestions for contingency
planning or risk assessment tools that can be
used. They cover a variety of reasons for challenging group
dynamics.
Your work in Module 5 will be helpful as you analyzed team
and group dynamics in depth! It is critical
that your rationale is provided based on research and reasoning
from the models and theories provided.