PSY 650 Week 3 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Ashford University(2020)
- ashford university / PSY 650
- 11 Dec 2020
- Price: $8
- Other / Other
PSY 650 Week 3 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Ashford University(2020)
PSY 650 Week 3 Discussion 1
Setting Boundaries When Working with Clients
Prior to beginning work on this week’s
discussion, please review Standard 3: Human
Relations in the APA’s
Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Please also read the Asay
and Lal (2014) “Who’s Googled Whom? Trainees’ Internet and Online Social
Networking Experiences, Behaviors, and Attitudes with Clients and Supervisors,”
Harris and Robinson Kurpius (2014) “Social Networking and Professional Ethics:
Client Searches, Informed Consent, and Disclosure,” and Taylor, McMinn,
Bufford, and Chang (2010) “Psychologists’ Attitudes and Ethical Concerns
Regarding the Use of Social Networking Web Sites” articles.
For this
discussion, you will examine ethical issues encountered by clinical and
counseling psychologists in the digital age. Begin by reviewing the cases of
Dr. Arnold and Dr. Washington listed below and selecting one of these ethical
dilemmas for analysis.
Case 1
Dr. Arnold is a clinical psychologist who specializes in child and adolescent
issues. From time to time, she provides consultation on high legality cases
within the juvenile court system. Recently, she was referred a case involving a
15-year-old male who has a history of aggression, angry outburst, destructive behavior,
and cyber stalking. Concerned for her safety and well-being, Dr. Arnold
input the client’s name into a search engine, which yielded the client’s social
network page. Dr. Arnold is uncertain whether or not to look at the client’s
social network page.
Case 2
Dr. Washington is a counseling psychologist who specializes in trauma and
self-harming behavior. Recently, he received a “friend request” from a former
client who he provided individual therapy to six months ago. Dr. Washington
opted not to accept the “friend request,” but considered sending a private
message to the client with the social networking policy from his informed
consent. Dr. Washington is uncertain whether or not to send the private
message to the client.
In your initial post, assume the role
of a colleague to the doctor named and analyze the ethical issues encountered
in your chosen case. Given the situation described in the case study, recommend
how your colleague should proceed. Provide support for your response by citing
the required articles for this discussion. Consider the current and potential
actions of your colleague and explain whether or not he or she is currently, or
potentially will be, in violation of the APA’s Ethical Principles of
Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Provide support for your explanation by
citing Standard 3: Human
Relations in the APA’s
Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Explain how your
colleague might avoid this type of ethical dilemma in the future. Describe what
policy or policies you might put in place if you were your colleague.
In your responses,
evaluate the recommendations suggested by your peer. State whether you agree or
disagree with your peer’s recommendation to the doctor on how to proceed.
Suggest other ethical implications your peer may not have considered in this
case. What follow up questions might you ask your peer to aid in the ethical
assessment of the case? In addition to the suggestions provided by your peer,
what recommendations might you make to the doctor so that he or she might avoid
these types of dilemmas in the future? What additions or changes might you make
to the policy or policies suggested by your peer?