PSY 640 Week 5 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help | Ashford University
- ashford university / PSY 640
- 10 Dec 2020
- Price: $8
- Other / Other
PSY 640 Week 5 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help | Ashford University
Week 5 - Discussion 2
Evaluating Assessment Instruments
Prior to beginning work on this
discussion, read Chapter 11 in the textbook, the article by Baez (2013), the
assigned chapters in the U.S.
Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration (2006)
guide , and view the
video Psychometric testing and employment..
For this discussion, you will use the PSY640 Checklist for Evaluating Tests document
to compare two assessment instruments used in industrial and organizational
(I-O) psychology assessment. Based on the information in your text and assigned
readings, select and evaluate two psychological tests used in
industrial-organizational psychological assessment. You may not evaluate any of
the tests you evaluated in the Week Four Applications in Personality Testing
discussion.
In addition to the text, locate a
minimum of two appropriate scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources to aid you in
the analysis of the psychometric properties of the instruments based on
published data. In your initial post, provide the names of the two tests you
evaluated, and attach your completed PSY640 Checklist for Evaluating Tests document . You must
maintain the original format of the document and include the textbook and two
additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources in the references section.
Guided Response:
Review several of your colleagues’ posts and respond to at least two of your
peers by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 of the week. You are encouraged to post your
required replies earlier in the week to promote more meaningful interactive
discourse in this discussion.
Evaluate the analysis presented by your colleague, including an
explanation of each of the following elements: the dimensions of completeness,
accuracy, and professional credibility of the analysis. Use your research and
the assigned readings to support your assertions.