Response

 
Evaluate one pro and con about the student's observation.  
Response Requirements:
Must:

Be 2 paragraphs in length
Be supported by the required textbook and one additional reference

Points deducted if the submission: 

Does not use the required textbook as one of the two reference sources 
    
You CANNOT use Wikipedia, LinkedIn articles, blogs, paid vendors, certification websites, or similar sources in academic writing. You CAN use reputable industry articles from publications similar to ComputerWeekly, PCMag, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, or similar sources. Academic journals and popular industry articles are accessible in the university’s library databases and Google Scholar. All references should not have a publication date older than 2005.


Does not respond to the question(s) thoroughly meaning with more than 2 paragraphs
Primarily consists of bullet points
Uses statements such as “I have gone through your post,” “I have gone through your discussion,” “adding a few more points,” “based on my knowledge,” “according to me,” “as per my knowledge,” or similar
Contains contractual phrases, as an example “shouldn't" "couldn't" or "didn't,” or similar
Uses vague words or phrases such as "proper," "appropriate," "adequate," “it is obvious,” “it is clear,” “in fact,” or similar to describe a process, function, or procedure
As an example, "proper incident response plan," "appropriate IT professional," "adequate security," or similar. These words are subjective because they have different meanings to different individuals.