ENGL 123 Week 5 Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
- embry-riddle-aeronautical-university / ENGL 123
- 06 Jun 2019
- Price: $6
- Other / Other
ENGL 123 Week 5 Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Summary
and Strong Response, Revised
Overview
It
is time to submit your final version of the Summary and Strong Response writing
assignment.
For
this assignment, you will summarize an editorial (opinion) piece found using
the Internet. Then, you will write a letter to the editor in response to the
editorial. It is not necessary to respond to every point in the editorial—and
probably not possible. You may respond to only one point if you wish.
Note: Since this is a personal
response, you may use "I" in your writing.
Questions you might ask yourself:
- What
is the author saying?
- How
does the author go about saying it (i.e. the evidence, rhetorical
strategies, and the like)?
- What
is your evaluation of what is written and how it is written?
Directions
This
assignment has two parts: a summary of the editorial and a strong
response. For the potential for full credit for this assignment, you must do
four things:
- Summarize
the editorial in 150-175 words. Be sure you present the thesis and
the major supporting points in an objective manner (i.e. do not insert
your opinions).
- Identify
the editorial and author in the first sentence of your summary and include
the link for your readers.
- Write
a response to the editor in 250-300 words. In your response, you may agree
with one or two points, but you must also show how you
"resist" the text by questioning it, or arguing with it
or refuting it. It may be helpful to think of your response as a reaction
to how the writer was trying to influence your thinking. Pay attention to
the words used to name and describe, the details included, and any
comparisons made. (The letter-to-the-editor format assumes readers have
read the article, so you do not need to summarize it in the letter.)
- Correctly
use attributive tags in your response to indicate which ideas came from
the press release and which are your own.
Once
you use the feedback from your peers and instructor, submit your final version.
Save
your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last
name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or
special characters.
Rubric
ENGL
123 M4 Summary and Strong Response Rubric
ENGL
123 M4 Summary and Strong Response Rubric |
||
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary: Thesis and Major Supporting
Points (30%) - Summary correctly identifies press release thesis and major
supporting points |
30.0 pts |
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary: Objective and Fairly Stated
(20%) - Summary fairly presents content of press release; avoids interjecting
the student’s opinion or response |
20.0 pts |
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse: Strength (20%) - Response
resists press release by questioning it, arguing with it or refuting it |
20.0 pts |
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse: Attributive Tags (10%) -
Response uses attributive tags to correctly identify ownership of ideas |
10.0 pts |
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Punctuation, Organization,
Word Range (20%) - Writing is well organized and free of grammar and
punctuation errors; both parts of the assignment are within the word ranges |
20.0 pts |
|
Total
Points: 100.0 |