ENGL 123 Week 5 Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
- embry-riddle-aeronautical-university / ENGL 123
- 06 Jun 2019
- Price: $8
- Other / Other
ENGL 123 Week 5 Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Annotated Bibliography
The Annotated Bibliography is
designed to give you practice in locating sources, evaluating sources, and
listing sources correctly in a references list according to APA style.
In Modules 6, 7, and 8, you will be
working on the Classical Argument
Assignment. For this module, you will not write a paper, but simply compile a
reference list with annotations. It is suggested, but not
necessary, that you select the topic you will argue in the Classical Argument
Assignment.
Follow the example at the bottom of
the assignment. List each source in correct APA format and include a brief summary
of the information you find in each source, along with a brief evaluation of
the source.
If you find a book or a long article,
do not read the entire thing. Look at the chapters in the book to create a
summary. Look for an abstract of the article, or for subtitled sections, or
else just skim the article. If you find a good website, skim through it or look
for a site map that lists the areas in the website and use that to create a
summary. Read some of the information on the site to form an evaluation.
Annotated Bibliography
Your assignment is to prepare an
annotated bibliography using APA documentation style. The assignment has two
parts: the list of sources and the annotation for each source.
The list of sources must contain:
1. The subject of your research, which
you must state at the top of the page.
2. Seven sources of information about your
subject, including:
a. At least two articles from one or
more databases in the Hunt Library
b. At least one scholarly article.
3. All sources correctly documented in
APA style.
4. The entire references list correctly
formatted in APA style.
Special note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable
source for scholarly work. Do not use Wikipedia as a source for this or any
academic assignment.
The annotation for each source must contain:
1. A short summary (1-3 sentences) of
the information found in the source.
2. An evaluation of the source's
credibility, reliability, currency, possible bias, and usefulness with respect
to your topic (2-3 sentences).
This
assignment cannot be revised. You are expected to use
the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association to
ensure your documentation is correct. If you have any questions, please contact
your instructor for guidance.
Example
Review the following example. The words in
italics (summary and evaluation) do not need to be in
your work; they are here just for the clarity of the example.
Subject: Homeschooling
Bauer, S. W., & Wise, J. (2016). The well-trained mind: A
guide to classical education (4th ed.).
New York, NY: Norton.
The authors discuss how homeschooling, by using the trivium
method of education, can make children well-rounded. This method involves,
in part, teaching grammar, logic and rhetoric at different stages
The authors provide a plethora of information for anyone considering
homeschooling, including suggested curricula, information on support
groups and online resources (summary). This is a credible
source written by two long-time educators with experience
in homeschooling. This is a useful source for readers wanting
to understand the benefits of homeschooling and the process to get
started (evaluation).
Submission
Save
your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last
name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or
special characters.
Rubric
ENGL
123 M5 Annotated Bibliography Rubric
ENGL
123 M5 Annotated Bibliography Rubric |
||
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubject; Alphabetical Order of List
(5%) - Research subject listed at the top of the page; entire list of sources
correctly alphabetized |
5.0 pts |
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTypes of Sources (4%) - List of
sources includes at least two articles from Hunt Library databases and one
scholarly article |
4.0 pts |
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummaries (14%) - Summary for each
source is adequate |
14.0 pts |
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluations (28%) - Evaluation for
each source covers credibility, reliability, currency, possible bias, and
usefulness with respect to topic |
28.0 pts |
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Required Information (14%) -
All required information included in each citation; no unnecessary
information is given |
14.0 pts |
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Order of Information (7%) - All
information in each citation is in the correct order |
7.0 pts |
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Mechanics (28%) - All mechanics
(capitalization, punctuation, italics or not, indentation, double-spacing,
etc.) correct |
28.0 pts |
|
Total
Points: 100.0 |