MGMT 221 Week 5 Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
5.3
Research Project Submission 2 (PLG2)
In this module, you will add to the research paper
document you started in Module 3.
Summary of Steps
1. Research your first two IS-related
solutions that you listed in your document during Module 3.
2. Edit your research paper document
based on the feedback you received in Module 3.
3. Using the same document, follow the
instructions below to write the introduction to your paper,
the first two IS-related solutions, and your references for
those sections.
4. Submit your document for grading.
Detailed instructions for this assignment are below
and in the Research Project Requirements section, which describes the
complete project.
Overview
In your role as an employee at a medium-to-large
aviation-related business, it's time to drill down to the specifics for two of
the Management Information Systems you selected. As you perform research and
compose your data, remember that you are in a mid-to-upper level management
position and have significant decision-making influence with your company.
Detailed Instructions
Before you begin to work on the Project Submission
2 assignment, review the instructor’s grading comments and markups on the
Project Submission 1 document and correct any issues. Re-save the corrected
Project Submission 1 document as a new Project Submission 2 working document.
The following are the submission requirements for
this assignment:
·
Begin the body of the text section with a brief paragraph consisting of
4-5 sentences that introduces the need for IS solutions in your company.
·
Submit researched scholarly data for TWO of the IS-related solutions
that you selected.
·
Submit a minimum of TWO full pages of double-spaced text in the Body of
the Text section for EACH IS-related solution. The TOTAL number of submitted
pages in the Body of the Text section is FOUR full pages. The Title, Abstract,
and Reference List pages are not considered part of the “FOUR full pages” in
the Body of the Text section.
·
A minimum of TWO primary reference sources outside of the course
textbook are required to be cited and referenced in the document submission.
·
As you do your research and compose data for each of the IS-related
solutions in each assignment, keep up the Reference List page and make notes
for the data in the Conclusion section that you will compose in your final
draft document.
Don’t forget to save the working document when you
have finished adding the new data.
Your document submission is due by the posted due
date. Your instructor will use the 5.3 Research Project: Submission 2 Rubric
for evaluating and grading your submission.
MGMT 221 5.3 Research Project: Submission 2 Rubric
|
MGMT 221 5.3 Research Project: Submission 2 Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeAnalysis & Comprehension
|
|
50.0 pts
Excellent
- A THOROUGH analysis of TWO topics was provided AND a HIGH level of
understanding of the topics was demonstrated.
|
45.0 pts
Very
Good - A THOROUGH analysis of TWO topics was provided AND a MODERATE level
of understanding of the topics was demonstrated.
|
40.0 pts
Satisfactory
- A BASIC analysis of TWO topics was provided AND a MODERATE level of
understanding of the topics was demonstrated.
|
35.0 pts
Near
Failing - A BASIC analysis of ONE topic was provided AND a MODERATE level
of understanding of the topic was demonstrated.
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- A BASIC analysis of ONE topic was NOT provided OR a MODERATE level of
understanding of ONE topic was NOT demonstrated.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeContent
|
|
15.0 pts
Excellent
- A minimum of FOUR FULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the
Body of the Text.
|
13.0 pts
Very
Good - A minimum of THREE AND ONE_HALF FULL pages of double-spaced text was
submitted in the Body of the Text.
|
11.0 pts
Satisfactory
- A minimum of THREE FULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the
Body of the Text.
|
9.0 pts
Near
Failing - A minimum of TWO AND ONE_HALF FULL pages of double-spaced text
was submitted in the Body of the Text.
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- A minimum of TWO AND ONE_HALF FULL pages of double-spaced text was NOT
submitted in the Body of the Text.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics
|
|
15.0 pts
Excellent
- ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused AND the data
was ENTIRELY free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
13.0 pts
Very
Good - ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused BUT
there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
11.0 pts
Satisfactory
- SOME sentences were not properly structured and carefully focused AND
there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
9.0 pts
Near
Failing - SOME sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY
spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- MANY sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling,
grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeScholarly Research
|
|
10.0 pts
Excellent
- Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of TWO outside
primary sources AND terminology from the source materials WAS presented.
|
9.0 pts
Very
Good - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of TWO outside
primary sources AND terminology from the source materials WAS NOT
presented.
|
8.0 pts
Satisfactory
-Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE outside
primary source AND terminology from the source materials WAS presented.
|
7.0 pts
Near
Failing - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE
outside primary source AND terminology from the source materials WAS NOT
presented.
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- Scholarly research was NOT conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE outside
primary source AND terminology from the source materials WAS NOT presented.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeAPA Style
|
|
10.0 pts
Excellent
-Excellent - ALL of the following APA style components were provided and
there were NO format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers,
Abstract Page (label only), Conclusion Section Header following the 2 MIS
topics in the Body of the Text (label only), Reference List Page (label
only).
|
9.0 pts
Very
Good - ALL of the following APA style components were provided AND there
were SOME format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers, Abstract
Page (label only), Conclusion Section Header following the 2 MIS topics in
the Body of the Text (label only), Reference List Page (label only).
|
8.0 pts
Satisfactory
- SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided AND there
were NO format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers, Abstract
Page (label only), Conclusion Section Header following the 2 MIS topics in
the Body of the Text (label only), Reference List Page (label only).
|
7.0 pts
Near
Failing - SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided AND
there were SOME format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers,
Abstract Page (label only), Conclusion Section Header following the 2 MIS
topics in the Body of the Text (label only), Reference List Page (label
only).
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided AND there
were MANY format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers,
Abstract Page (label only), Conclusion Section Header following the 2 MIS
topics in the Body of the Text (label only), Reference List Page (label
only).
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.0
|
USA 
India
Question Attachments
1 attachments —