MGMT 221 Week 4 Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
4.3
Module Review: Questions (PLG1)
This Module Review assignment requires you to
answer complex questions that are related to the topics presented in the module
readings and have been designed to develop your critical thinking skills.
Use the course textbook AND outside primary sources
to obtain data that supports your answers. Follow the guidelines in
the Module Review Questions Requirements section, including
using current APA style and pasting the questions in bold before each answer.
Questions
1. Explain the concept of a crawler
search engine.
2. How has the utilization of mobile
technologies impacted search engine optimization practices?
3. Describe how mashups create new
benefits and functionality from existing data or information.
Your document submission is due by the posted due
date. Your instructor will use the rubric for evaluating and grading your
submission.
Save your assignment using a naming convention that
includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do
not add punctuation or special characters.
MGMT 221 4.3 Module Review: Questions Rubric
|
MGMT 221 4.3 Module Review: Questions Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeAnalysis
|
|
25.0 pts
Excellent
- The answers contained a VERY HIGH level of critical analysis with words
chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.
|
22.5 pts
Very
Good - The answers contained a HIGH level of critical analysis with words
chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.
|
20.0 pts
Satisfactory
- The answers contained a MODERATE level of critical analysis with words
chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.
|
17.5 pts
Near
Failing - The answers contained a LOW level of critical analysis with words
chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- The answers contained NO coherent level of critical analysis.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeContent
|
|
25.0 pts
Excellent
- ALL of the questions were FULLY answered.
|
22.5 pts
Very
Good - Satisfactory - ONE question was NOT FULLY answered.
|
20.0 pts
Satisfactory
- TWO questions were NOT FULLY answered.
|
17.5 pts
Near
Failing - THREE questions were NOT FULLY answered.
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- ONE answer was COMPLETELY missing.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeAccuracy
|
|
15.0 pts
Excellent
- The answers are COMPLETELY accurate.
|
14.0 pts
Very
Good - The answers are MOSTLY accurate with ONE error.
|
11.0 pts
Satisfactory
- The answers are SOMEWHAT accurate with TWO errors.
|
9.0 pts
Near
Failing - The answers are SOMEWHAT inaccurate with MORE THAN TWO errors.
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- ALL answers are COMPLETELY inaccurate.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning
OutcomeStyle & Mechanics
|
|
15.0 pts
Excellent
- ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused AND the data
was ENTIRELY free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
13.0 pts
Very
Good - ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused BUT
there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
11.0 pts
Satisfactory
- SOME sentences were not properly structured and carefully focused AND
there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
9.0 pts
Near
Failing - SOME sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY
spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- MANY sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling,
grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeScholarly Research
|
|
10.0 pts
Excellent
- Scholarly research was conducted utilizing BOTH the course readings AND
outside sources AND terminology from the source materials WAS presented.
|
9.0 pts
Very
Good - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing BOTH the course readings
AND outside sources BUT terminology from the source materials WAS NOT
presented.
|
8.0 pts
Satisfactory
- Scholarly research was conducted utilizing EITHER the course readings OR
outside sources AND terminology from the source materials WAS presented.
|
7.0 pts
Near
Failing - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing EITHER the course
readings OR outside sources BUT terminology from the source materials WAS
NOT presented.
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- NO evidence that scholarly research was conducted AND NO terminology from
the source materials was presented.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeAPA Style
|
|
10.0 pts
Excellent
- Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with NO
errors.
|
9.0 pts
Very
Good - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with
ONE error.
|
8.0 pts
Satisfactory
- Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with TWO
errors.
|
7.0 pts
Near
Failing - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style
with THREE errors.
|
0.0 pts
Failing
- Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with MORE
than THREE errors.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.0
|
Purpose
of Module Review Questions
Module Review Questions allow you to demonstrate your understanding of the
module topics and to develop your critical thinking skills.
Required
Research
In order to answer the questions, you will first engage in a process of
scholarly research for the purpose of obtaining data that can be utilized to
support your answers. Conduct in-depth research in the course textbook AND
outside primary sources.
It is
strongly recommended that you conduct research utilizing the ERAU Hunt Library. The
Hunt Library contains a great amount of information on aviation and other
topics. A benefit of utilizing the Hunt Library is the availability of the APA
style citation/reference tool that is provided when conducting research
utilizing the EAGLEsearch feature. This tool can automatically provide the
proper APA style formats for citations and references.
USA 
India