MGMT 221 Week 3 Case Study | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University

MGMT 221 Week 3 Case Study | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University 

3.3 Case Study: Cybersecurity (PLG1)

Overview

One of the responsibilities placed on managers in today's On-Demand Economy is that of ensuring that the business processes are held to a high degree of cybersecurity. Because the concept of data-on-demand is an operational necessity that places the enterprise's and customers' resources at risk to potential fraudulent hacks, all employees, including those that sit in the loftiest of office spaces, must be trained, made aware of the various methods and practices that can lead to vulnerabilities, and held to very high standards of compliance with standard cybersecurity practices.

The growth of mobile technologies and the IoT have played a significant role in the On-Demand Economy environment. A downside to the proliferation of such technologies is the cracks and doors into the corporate and agency networks that have been opened along the data path, allowing for an increased level of black hat intrusions and reconnaissance.

Case Study Assignment

Download the APA Style Template (DOCX) and review the Case Study Requirements section.

Conduct research on various methodologies and solutions relating to the implementation of effective cybersecurity programs that may be utilized to thwart outside-agency attacks on an enterprise’s networks. Your approach here should be to seek out scholarly source data relating to examples of the various cybersecurity measures that top management and IT departments might provide for employees and contractors, including data access enforcement, network intrusion detection and prevention systems, and real-time responses to incidents and attacks. You could focus your research on any one of the various types of defenses such as anti-malware applications, Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs), Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPSs), biometric access, rogue app monitoring, mobile kill switch, or remote wipe capability technologies.

Follow the guidelines in the Case Study Requirements section.

Your document submission is due by the posted due date. Your instructor will use the 3.3 Case Study Rubric for evaluating and grading your submission.

Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.

MGMT 221 3.3 Case Study Rubric

MGMT 221 3.3 Case Study Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis & Content

55.0 pts

Excellent - A THOROUGH analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum of TWO FULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the body of the text.

45.0 pts

Very Good - A THOROUGH analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum of ONE & ONE-HALF FULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the body of the text.

40.0 pts

Satisfactory - A BASIC analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum of TWO FULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the body of the text.

35.0 pts

Near Failing - A BASIC analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum of ONE & ONE-HALF FULL pages of double-spaced text were submitted in the body of the text.

0.0 pts

Failing - A minimum of ONE & ONE-HALF FULL pages of double-spaced text was NOT submitted in the body of the text.

55.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion & Recommendations

15.0 pts

Excellent - The conclusion was sound AND the recommendations were ENTIRELY appropriate.

13.0 pts

Very Good - The conclusion was sound AND the recommendations were MOSTLY appropriate.

11.0 pts

Satisfactory - The conclusion was sound AND the recommendations were SOMEWHAT appropriate.

9.0 pts

Near Failing - The conclusion was NOT sound OR the recommendations were NOT SOMEWHAT appropriate.

0.0 pts

Failing - A conclusion with recommendations was NOT presented.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics

10.0 pts

Excellent - ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused AND the data was ENTIRELY free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

9.0 pts

Very Good - ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused BUT there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

8.0 pts

Satisfactory - SOME sentences were not properly structured and carefully focused AND there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

7.0 pts

Near Failing - SOME sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

0.0 pts

Failing - MANY sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Research

10.0 pts

Excellent - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of TWO outside primary sources AND terminology from the source materials was presented.

9.0 pts

Very Good - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of TWO outside primary sources AND terminology from the source materials was NOT presented.

8.0 pts

Satisfactory - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE outside primary source AND terminology from the source materials was presented.

7.0 pts

Near Failing - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE outside primary source AND terminology from the source materials WAS NOT presented.

0.0 pts

Failing - Scholarly research was NOT conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE outside primary source AND terminology from the source materials was NOT presented.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style

10.0 pts

Excellent - ALL of the following APA style components were provided AND there were NO format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers, Abstract Page, Conclusion, Reference List Page.

9.0 pts

Very Good - ALL of the following APA style components were provided AND there were SOME format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers, Abstract Page, Conclusion, Reference List Page.

8.0 pts

Satisfactory - SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided AND there were NO format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers, Abstract Page, Conclusion, Reference List Page.

7.0 pts

Near Failing - SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided AND there were SOME format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers, Abstract Page, Conclusion, Reference List Page.

0.0 pts

Failing - SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided AND there were MANY format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers, Abstract Page, Conclusion, Reference List Page.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

 

Answer Detail

Get This Answer

Invite Tutor