ACCT/505 ACCT505 ACCT 505 Week 6 Assignment
- Devry University / ACCT 505
- 22 Jun 2018
- Price: $8
- Other / Other
ACCT 505 Week 6 Assignment
Week 6 Signature Assignment Team Case Study 3
Please view the Week 6 Team Case Study (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. document and complete the case with your team.
Don't forget to submit your assignment.
ACCT505 –
Managerial Accounting
Signature
Assignment: Team Case Study 3 – Week 6
Balanced Scorecard
Case – Team Case (2-3 team members)
(Course Objective
G)
Many companies are
using the Balanced Scorecard System to assist in their performance management. According
to Garrison, Noreen, and Brewer (2015) a balanced scorecard“consists of
integrated set of performance measures that are derived from and support a
company’s strategy” (p. 490). In a Balanced Scorecard System the company’s
strategy is translated into a system of performance measures that are used to
monitor the company’s performance in meeting its strategic objectives.
As part of a
two-member team, your task is to identify and discuss the key performance
measures of a balanced scorecard. Then, find three companies that are currently
using a Balanced Scorecard System by doing an internet and library database
search. Internet searches as well searches of financial databases, such as Yahoo
Finance, should help you in your efforts. Then discuss in as much detail as
possible the specifics of the balanced scorecard thatis being used by these
companies.
Deliverable
Your team should
prepare a 6-8slidePowerPoint presentation, explaining the specifics of the
balanced scorecard system of the three companies you selected in your research.
This presentation should include your analysis of the advantages and
disadvantages of each company’s Balanced Scorecard System. Be sure to clearly
document the performance measures being used by each of the three companies.
Your PowerPoint
presentation should be narrated using VoiceThread or similar technology. All
team members must participate in the narration of the PowerPoint presentation.
APA standards are
required to be followed for this presentation.
Reference
Garrison, R.H., Noreen, E.C, & Brewer,
Brewer, P.C. (2015). Managerial
Accounting (15thed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Grading Rubric
|
|
Possible Points |
Criteria and Point Range |
|||
|
Identification and Discussion of Performance Measures |
20 |
0-12 |
11-13 |
14-16 |
17-20 |
|
Performance measures are not
identified, nor is any detail provided about the company’s measures. |
Performance measures are
partly identify, and limited information about each company’s performance
measures is provided. |
All performance measures are
identified, but generic information about each company’s performance measures
is provided. |
. All performance measures
are identified and detail is provided about each company’s performance
measures |
||
|
Analysis of BSC Strengths and Weaknesses |
30 |
0-17 |
18-21 |
22-25 |
26-30 |
|
No or very limited analysis
of strengths and weaknesses is provided. |
Strengths and weaknesses of
each scorecard is provided in a very limited fashion. No evaluation is
provided of the best scorecard. . |
Most significant strengths
and weaknesses are discussed an analyzed. Limited evaluation of the best
scorecard is discussed. . |
All significant strengths
and weaknesses of each company are discussed and analyzed. An evaluation of
the best scorecard is discussed. |
||
|
Form |
20 |
0-12 |
11-13 |
14-16 |
17-20 |
|
Poor writing and
presentation skills, or no presentation provided. |
Several problems noted in
regard to writing and presentation skills. |
Writing and presentation
done well with a few minor errors |
Virtually no errors in
writing or presentation. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA 
India