BUS/475 BUS475 BUS 475 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1
- University of Phoenix / BUS 475
- 01 May 2018
- Price: $10
- Other / Other
BUS 475 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1
Assignment 1
Purpose of Assignment
Students
will have the opportunity to analyze and critique other team members'
submissions from the previous week's assignment. The team feedback will allow
all team members to improve their Week 2 assignments in preparation for their
final strategic plan.
Assignment Steps
Discuss drafts
of your Business Model and Strategic Plan, Part I Individual assignment from
Week 2 with all team members.
Choose two
or three team member's drafts and review as a team this week. You will review a
different team member's drafts each week. By Week 5, all team members' papers
should have been reviewed at least once.
Propose detailed
feedback and critical analysis team members can incorporate into their drafts.
Prepare a
maximum 700-word synopsis summarizing what the team has learned from the review
and discussion. Please make sure to include specific recommendations for each
of the submitted papers.
Click the Assignment Files tab to
submit your assignment.
Note: Grades
are awarded based upon individual contributions to the Learning Team
assignment. Each Learning Team member receives a grade based upon his/her
contributions to the team assignment. Not all students may receive the same
grade for the team assignment.
Strategic
Management, Ch. 5: Strategies in Action
Consider the following as
you read:
- What are the main factors that
make up an effective strategic objective?
Peer Review Analysis and Critique
Grading Guide
BUS/475 Version 7
Integrated Business Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by University of
Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered
trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT®
are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial
standards and practices.
Learning Team: Peer Review Analysis and Critique
Purpose of Assignment
Students will have the
opportunity to analyze and critique other team members’ submissions from the
previous week’s assignment. The team
feedback will allow all team members to improve their Week 2 assignments in
preparation for their final strategic plan.
Grading Guide
|
Met |
Partially Met |
Not Met |
Comments: |
|
|
Discussed drafts of student’s Business Model and
Strategic Plan, Part I Individual assignment from Week 2 with all team
members. |
|
|
|
|
|
Chose two or three team member's drafts and
reviewed as a team this week. |
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed detailed feedback and critical analysis
that team members can incorporate into their drafts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepared
a summary of what the team learned from the review and discussion. Included specific recommendations for each
of the submitted papers. |
|
|
|
|
|
The synopsis is a maximum of 700 words in length. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
7 |
#/7 |
|
|
Writing Guidelines |
Met |
Partially Met |
Not Met |
Comments: |
|
Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
The tone is appropriate to the content and
assignment. |
|
|
|
|
|
The introduction provides a sufficient
background on the topic and previews major points. |
|
|
|
|
|
Paragraph transitions are present, logical,
and maintain the flow throughout the paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
The conclusion is logical, flows from the
body of the paper, and reviews the major points. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mechanics |
|
|
|
|
|
The paper—including tables and graphs,
headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting
guidelines and meets course-level requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property is recognized with
in-text citations and a reference page. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rules of grammar and usage are followed
including spelling and punctuation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
3 |
#/3 |
|
|
Assignment Total |
# |
10 |
#/10 |
|
|
Additional comments: |
||||
USA 
India