BUS/475 BUS475 BUS 475 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1
- University of Phoenix / BUS 475
- 03 Jan 2018
- Price: $15
- Other / Other
BUS 475 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1
Assignment 1
Peer Review Analysis and Critique Grading Guide
BUS/475 Version 7
Integrated Business Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these marks is not intended to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.
Learning Team: Peer Review Analysis and Critique
Purpose of Assignment
Students will have the opportunity to analyze and critique other team members’ submissions from the previous week’s assignment. The team feedback will allow all team members to improve their Week 2 assignments in preparation for their final strategic plan.
Grading Guide
|
Content |
Met |
Partially Met |
Not Met |
Comments: |
|
Discussed drafts of student’s Business Model and Strategic Plan, Part I Individual assignment from Week 2 with all team members. |
|
|
|
|
|
Chose two or three team member's drafts and reviewed as a team this week. |
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed detailed feedback and critical analysis that team members can incorporate into their drafts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepared a summary of what the team learned from the review and discussion. Included specific recommendations for each of the submitted papers. |
|
|
|
|
|
The synopsis is a maximum of 700 words in length. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
7 |
#/7 |
|
|
Writing Guidelines |
Met |
Partially Met |
Not Met |
Comments: |
|
Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. |
|
|
|
|
|
The introduction provides a sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. |
|
|
|
|
|
Paragraph transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews the major points. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mechanics |
|
|
|
|
|
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
3 |
#/3 |
|
|
Assignment Total |
# |
10 |
#/10 |
|
|
Additional comments:
|
||||
Strategic Management, Ch. 5: Strategies in Action
Consider the following as you read:
- What are the main factors that make up an effective strategic objective?
Peer Review Analysis and Critique
Purpose of Assignment
Students will have the opportunity to analyze and critique other team members' submissions from the previous week's assignment. The team feedback will allow all team members to improve their Week 2 assignments in preparation for their final strategic plan.
Assignment Steps
Discuss drafts of your Business Model and Strategic Plan, Part I Individual assignment from Week 2 with all team members.
Choose two or three team member's drafts and review as a team this week. You will review a different team member's drafts each week. By Week 5, all team members' papers should have been reviewed at least once.
Propose detailed feedback and critical analysis team members can incorporate into their drafts.
Prepare a maximum 700-word synopsis summarizing what the team has learned from the review and discussion. Please make sure to include specific recommendations for each of the submitted papers.
USA 
India