ACC 207 Module Five Case Study Analysis Rubric
ACC 207 Module Five Case Study Analysis Rubric
Prompt: Create a short case study report summarizing your research of a reimbursement-related contract dispute between the U.S. government and a contractor. Your report should include the following: the reason for and nature of the contract, a summary of the outcome of the dispute, and a conclusion presenting your overall analysis of the allegations, dispute, and outcome.
Format: This short paper assignment should follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA style. Page length requirements: 1–2 pages, not including the cover page or the reference page.
Instructor Feedback: Students can find feedback in the Grade Center or Turnitin.
|
Critical Elements |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Value |
|
Dispute |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides specific and relevant details to support explanation
(18-20) |
Accurately identifies and explains a contract dispute between the U.S. government and a contractorand addresses the reason and nature of the contract (16-17) |
Does not sufficiently explain and identify a contract disputebetween the U.S. government and a contractor
(14-15) |
Does not correctly identify a contract disputebetween the U.S. government and a contractor
(0-13) |
20 |
|
Outcome
|
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides relevant details to support the reason for the outcome (27-30) |
Accurately describes the outcome of the contract dispute
(24-26) |
Does not sufficiently describe the outcome of the contract dispute
(21-23) |
Does not correctly describe the outcome of the contract dispute
(0-20) |
30 |
|
Conclusions |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses clear and relevant examples to support the implications for reimbursement contracts (27-30) |
Analyzes the contract dispute and explains its implications for reimbursement contracts
(24-26) |
Analyzes the contract dispute but does not sufficiently explain the implications for reimbursement contracts
(21-23) |
Does not analyze the contract dispute and its implications
(0-20) |
30 |
|
Articulation of Response |
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, orsyntax and is presented in a professional and easy to read format (18-20) |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax
(16-17) |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (14-15) |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas
(0-14) |
20 |
|
Earned Total Comments: |
100% |
||||
USA 
India