CWV 101 WEEK 7 ASSIGNMENT Help | Grand Canyon University
- Grand Canyon University / CWV-101
- 25 Oct 2017
- Price: $40
- Other / Other
CVW 101 WEEK 7 ASSIGNMENT Help | Grand Canyon University
Assignment 1
Ethical Dilemmas
Choose only one of the
ethical dilemmas below to address in your essay. The questions at the end of
each dilemma are intended for you to reflect on. For your paper you must
organize your writing using the sections and underlined titles listed on the
assignment page. Do not copy the case study into your essay.
1. Pornography
TJ secretly enjoys
pornography. He gets a great deal of gratification out of viewing Internet
pornography and masturbating, though he always acts behind closed doors and
believes that his actions have no effect on others. He justifies his behavior
by saying, ‘Who am I harming?’
Then he discovers a
statistic onthe Global Initiative to Fight Human Trafficking website (http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/labour/Forced_labour/HUMAN_TRAFFICKING_-_THE_FACTS_-_final.pdf)
stating that 43% of human trafficking victims are used for forced commercial
sexual exploitation, of whom 98% are women and girls, and that the pornography
business is a multibillion dollar industry (Global Initiative, n.d.).
His freedom to view
pornography is now at odds with harm to himself (addiction) and others (abuse
through forced trafficking and media exploitation). (More information can be
found at http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/may/may_17pornographycost.html,
which is a report by William May called“The Social Costs of Pornography”
provided by the Witherspoon Institute out of Princeton [May, 2010].)
How should PJ respond?
Should he maintain his lifestyle because of his freedom of choice or should he
change his behavior because of the harm done? What is his responsibility for
the harm that the pornography industry can cause, even if he himself is not
directly harming someone else?
2. Euthanasia
Joni was 17 when she
was swimming with friends in the Chesapeake Bay. She dove into the water,
misjudging the depth, and fractured her vertebrae. This left her a
quadriplegic, paralyzed from her shoulders down. As might be expected, she went
into severe depression, even having serious thoughts of ending her life. Her
quality of life was severely diminished. Her future looked horribly bleak. What
could she ever hope to accomplish as a human being in such a weakened state?
Why should she be forced to endure a life of suffering and hardship, and be a
burden to her family?
Should her wishes to be
euthanized be granted? What do you think? Should someone in her condition be
permitted to have her life legally terminated?
3. Religious
Tolerance
In September 2014,
Inter Varsity Christian Fellowship was “derecognized” by the 23 public
California State University schools because the Christian organization requires
its leaders to hold Christian beliefs. Tina is a volunteer leader of Inter Varsity
Christian Fellowship at a particular public university. The new university
policy requires that recognized campus groups have a non-discrimination policy
that says an organization cannot require its leaders to hold any particular
beliefs (Stetzer, 2014). Being a recognized group is important to Tina, since
it affects such circumstances as free access to meeting rooms, advertisements
at University sponsored events, and official engagement with faculty and
students. Tina believes that student leaders must hold to essential Christian
beliefs for the sake of the group’s purpose, though Intervarsity has always
welcomed anyone from any faith background to be a part of the group. Yet the
University system requires all recognized campus groups to sign a
state-mandated non-discrimination policy stating that both membership and
leadership positions are open for anyone, whether they support the beliefs of
the group or not (Winston, 2014). How should Tina respond to the university
leadership, if at all? What changes should Tina make to her chapter of Intervarsity
Christian Fellowship, if any?
4. Abortion
After trying for many
years, Susan finally gets pregnant. Unfortunately, a blood test confirms that
her baby has Down syndrome, and her doctors suggest she abort the fetus. Susan
has a successful career and wants to maintain a healthy balance between her
career and family. Yet she feels very uncomfortable with abortion. She seeks
some advice from Richard, an influential professor of evolutionary biology who
has spent his career seeking to further human potential and minimize human
suffering. When Susan asks Richard if she should abort the fetus or give birth
to a baby with Down syndrome, Richard replied that human beings should increase
happiness and decrease suffering in this world, and that therefore he would
suggest that she abort, though he also stated that she must make this choice
for herself. Richard emphasized the lifelong suffering of both the child with
Down syndrome and Susan as the child’s caretaker and stated that it may be
immoral to bring a baby into the world if she knew the kind of suffering the
child would experience. In fact, Richard suggested that perhaps the most
ethical course of action would be to prevent this baby from living a life full
of suffering. (This scenario is based on the following article by Richard
Dawkins (2014): https://richarddawkins.net/2014/08/abortion-down-syndrome-an-apology-for-letting-slip-the-dogs-of-twitterwar/).
How should Susan
respond? What decision should she make if her baby would suffer with Down
syndrome, yet she wants to have a baby?
5. Performance
Enhancing Drugs
As a successful young
athlete, Paul has been working hard in the weight room and on the field, and he
has earned a starting position on his team. As his team develops, some members
of his team have been experimenting with a new performance-enhancing drug and
have seen remarkable results. The drug is not a banned substance, largely
because it is not widely known, and Paul has seen it work for several of his
teammates, who remind Paul of the remarkable fact that this drug cannot be
traced by any drug test available. Paul wants to succeed but is finding he may
be left behind by those who are getting bigger and faster. The coach seems to
be aware of the drug use but has ignored it because the team has-been winning
so far and the drug is technically not an illegal substance yet. Paul was just
told by his coach that some changes may be taking place and he may lose his
starting position. His friend offered him a sample of the drug to “catch up”
with the others. What should his response be in regard to legal, physical, and
spiritual implications?
References
Dawkins, R. (2014, August
21). Abortion & Down syndrome: An apology for letting
slip the dogs of
Twitterwar. Retrieved
Gianna Jessenabortion
survivor in Australia part 1. (2008). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPF1FhCMPuQ
Global Initiative to
Fight Human Trafficking.(n.d.). Human trafficking: The facts. Retrieved
from https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/labour/Forced_labour/HUMAN_TRAFFICKING_-_THE_FACTS_-_final.pdf
May, W. E. (2010). The
social costs of pornography. Retrieved
from http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/may/may_17pornographycost.html
Stetzer, E. (2014,
September 6). Inter Varsity “derecognized” at California State
University’s 23
campuses: Some analysis and reflections. Christianity Today.
Retrieved from http://www.christianitytoday.com/edstetzer/2014/september/intervarsity-now-derecognized-in-california-state-universit.html
Winston, K.
(2014,September 10). InterVarsity, college Christian group
"de-recognized" at California State University campuses. The
Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/09/intervarsity-sanctioned-california-state-university_n_5791906.html
Example Ethical
Dilemma Essay
Belowis a real estate
case study and an abbreviated essay to use as an example of
the flow of thought for your paper. For the actual assignment, you will need to
research your topic, expand more on each paragraph, and cite additional
resources as instructed.
Remember to include
your name, course, date, and instructor at the top of your paper, and review
the directions on “How to Use the Opposing Viewpoints Database in the GCU
Library.”
Case Study:
Suppose at the real
estate office where you work, a woman from out of town calls and asks you to
list her deceased father's home. She tells you she is concerned only in selling
it quickly and will be happy to get $70,000 for it. You do a quick assessment
of the house and determine that it is worth at least $100,000, and realize that
it would be a perfect place for your son who just started looking for a small
house he could afford.
Abbreviated Real Estate
Ethical Dilemma Essay
People face ethical
dilemmas all through their lives, some minor with few consequences, and others
major with large, sometimes unexpected, negative consequences. How we navigate
our way through these dilemmas is influenced by our worldview, and has an
impact on shaping our worldview. I will examine the real estate ethical dilemma
according to my Christian worldview, and compare it to other options of
resolving the dilemma.
Ethical Dilemma
This case involves my
response to a woman who has contacted me as her real estate agent to sell her
father's house. She is anxious to sell it for $70,000. After I looked at the
house, I realized that it would be just right for my son who needs a small
house, but I determined that it is actually worth at least $100,000.
The dilemma is that I
could easily save my son $30,000 and get him a nice house, but to do so would
be taking advantage of the woman who owns it. To resolve the dilemma I could do
one of the following:
- I could go ahead and have my son
purchase the house for the asking price of $70,000, telling the woman that
this is the value.
- I could explain to the woman that
the house is really worth $100,000, but that my son is willing to purchase
it right now for the asking price.
Core Beliefs
One of my core beliefs
is the eighth commandment that says, "You shall not steal." Since the
house is worth $30,000 more than the woman thinks it is worth, if I sell it for
her at the lower price, I may be stealing from her.
Another core belief is
the ninth commandment that forbids lying. In order to sell the house to the
woman at the lower value, I would have to convince her, or at least deceive her
into thinking that what she wants from the house ($70,000) is a reasonable
value.
Another core belief is
the Golden Rule of Jesus from Matthew 7:12, which says, "Do to others what
you would have them do to you" (NIV). In this case, if I were the
homeowner, I would certainly want to sell it for what it is worth.
Resolution
The Christian thing to
do here would be for me to explain to the woman that her house is worth more
than $70,000, and inform her of the fair market value of the house. I could
then offer that my son may be interested in purchasing it if she is willing to
sell it at the lower price right away.
Evaluation
As a result of my
honesty, the lady might choose to list the house for $100,000, which, being too
high a price for my son to afford, would mean that he would not get the house.
The benefit would be
that I could rest assured that my client is getting a fair deal and is
satisfied with my honest work ethic. I could also sleep well knowing that I did
the right thing, as Jesus would do.
Comparison
Another worldview may
not have such scruples about lying, stealing, and living by the Golden Rule.
One could justify that if the woman gets what she wants – selling the house
quickly for $70,000, and I get what I want, a great value house for my son, then
it is a win-win proposition. So, in this case, what difference does it make if
the womanise uninformed about the true value of the house? Such justification
might sound like this, “And indeed, experience tells us that locally
capitalized neighbourhood markets do sustain their own rational order founded
as they are upon an interlocking system of self-interested exchange” (Whybrow,
2010).
There could be an
unintended consequence, however, if the woman should discover the true value of
the house and realize that she was deceived into selling at a low price. How
might she react, possibly taking me to court?
Conclusion
This dilemma causes me
to wrestle with staying true to my core beliefs and trusting God with the
results. For a Christian, this may be seen as a kind of test: Am I faithful to
what I claim to believe, or do I allow my selfishness to gain the upper hand? I
hope that if I ever face such a situation I will endeavour to do the right
thing.
In this assignment, you
will analyze the implications of an ethical issue according to your worldview.
Write a 1,000-1,500
word essay in which you analyze ethical thinking and use values-based decision
making to address a case study from the perspective of the Christian worldview
as compared to your own worldview assumptions. Choose one case study from the
five options listed on the “Ethical Dilemmas” document.
After an appropriate
introductory paragraph with a thesis statement in which you name the scenario
you are choosing, address each of the following six sections with at least one
paragraph each. Use the underlined titles for each of your headings.
1. Ethical
Dilemma: Briefly describe the ethical dilemma in your own
words, including (a) what in the scenario makes it difficult to make an ethical
decision and (b) at least two options for resolving the scenario, providing a
brief overview of what sort of ethical decisions each option might make.
2. Core
Beliefs: What beliefs about God and humanity from the
Christian worldview are relevant to the scenario? How might these core
worldview commitments of Christians influence one's decision making with regard
to this scenario?
3. Resolution:
Describe the Christian worldview's proposal for resolving the ethical dilemma.
How should the person in the scenario act according to the Christian worldview?
What is the best course of action for a Christian? (Note: The resolution should
be consistent with Christian worldview commitments.)
4. Evaluation:
What might be the unintended consequences and perceived benefits of the
resolution proposed by the Christian worldview?
5. Comparison:
How does the Christian worldview's resolution compare to another option?
6. Conclusion:
Synthesize the main points, pulling the ideas of the paper together.
7. References
Use and cite two course
resources (textbook, lectures, and the Bible), and at least two scholarly
sources from the GCU online library that address the issue from opposing sides.
Refer to the directions on “Navigating the GCU Library for CWV Benchmark
Research” and the “Example Ethical Dilemma Essay” documents.
Prepare this assignment
according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a
rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become
familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Resources
Whybrow, P. C. (2010).
The Addictive Striving for Wealth Has Negative Social Repercussions. In R. D.
Lankford, Jr. (Ed.), At Issue. Are America's Wealthy Too
Powerful? Detroit: Greenhaven Press. (Reprinted from Dangerously
Addictive, Chronicle of Higher Education, 2009, March 13) Retrieved
from https://library.gcu.edu:2443/login?url=http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&displayGroups=&sortBy=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010719216&source=Bookmark&u=canyonuniv&jsid=8bc5e341a2349fa327a885799c45fb80
Question Attachments
0 attachments —