HRM/326 HRM326 HRM 326 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1
- University of Phoenix / HRM 326
- 05 Oct 2017
- Price: $20
- Other / Other
HRM 326 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1
Training Evaluation
Training evaluations are important to determine if the selected training solution was effective and provided the appropriate return on investment.
Discuss as a team the last training program you attended (at work, school, other).
Select one of your team members' experiences and design a training evaluation form.
Write a 525- to 700-word description of the training program.
Provide an explanation of how you would evaluate the training program.
Include what you are specifically measuring, the timeframe, a description of the evaluation form, and how it will appropriately measure the training solution.
Include at least one weakness and one threat with a substantive explanation of the risks.
Create a one-page training evaluation form.
Cite any sources according to APA formatting guidelines.
Click on the Assignment Files tab to submit your write-up and the training evaluation form in one document.
Training Evaluation Grading Guide
HRM/326 Version 4
Employee Development
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these marks is not intended to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.
Learning Team Assignment: Training Evaluation
Purpose of Assignment
The purposes of this assignment is to work as a team to determine the appropriate level of evaluation that is needed for a training program of their choice. Training evaluations are important to determine if the selected training solution was effective and provided the appropriate return on investment.
Grading Guide
|
Content 70 Percent |
Met
|
Partially Met |
Not Met
|
Comments: |
|
The team discusses the last training program they attended. |
|
|
|
|
|
The team selects a specific training program to design a training evaluation form.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The team provides an explanation of how they will evaluate the training program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The team includes what specifically is being measured, the timeframe, a description of the evaluation form, and how it will appropriately measure the training solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
The team includes at least one weakness and one threat with a substantive explanation of the risks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The team creates a one page evaluation form |
|
|
|
|
|
The assignment is between 525 to 700 words. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
7 |
#/7 |
|
|
Writing Guidelines 30 Percent |
Met
|
Partially Met |
Not Met
|
Comments: |
|
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. |
|
|
|
|
|
Paragraph and sentence transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
3 |
#/3 |
|
|
Assignment Total |
# |
10 |
#/10 |
|
|
Additional comments:
|
||||
USA 
India