CJA/385 CJA 385 CJA 385 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT 2
- University of Phoenix / CJA 385
- 04 Oct 2017
- Price: $24
- Other / Other
CJA 385 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT 2
Assignment 2
Criminal Justice Policy in Practice Evaluation Proposal
Prepare an evaluation proposal (including anticipated results) for criminal justice policy or program in your area of interest.
Create a 14- to 16-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with detailed speaker notes. The proposal should include:
- A title of proposed study
- Abstract (maximum of 150 word summary of entire proposal)
- A background section, including a description of the policy or program, and the goals and objectives of the program
- The purpose of the evaluation
- Evaluation questions, including:
- Methodology (sample groups, setting, instrumentation, procedures, and data)
- Analysis
- Significance of the study
- Limitations
- Mock or real presentation of results
- Conclusions and recommendations
Format your presentation in accordance with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
Content and Organization |
Percent Earned: |
Comments |
||
Prepare an evaluation proposal (including anticipated results) for criminal justice policy or program in your area of interest. Create a 14- to 16-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with detailed speaker notes. The proposal should include:
Format your presentation in accordance with APA guidelines. |
|
|
||
· Presentation is of required length |
5/5 |
You provided a presentation within the required limits. |
||
All key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way |
|
|||
The following are included; · Title page · Abstract · Background section · Description of the policy or program · Goals and objectives of the program |
15/15 |
All the elements of the presentation were included. You gave a clear well thought out abstract that set the scene for an excellent appraisal of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. The background information was complete and I liked that you tied it into a galvanizing moment with Len Bias because this was a defining event to spur this policy. |
||
· Explain the purpose of evaluation |
15/15 |
Again you provided a strong rationale for the evaluation of this policy. Especially in the light of some of the unintended consequences with regard to the courts and corrections. |
||
· Evaluation Methodology is described
|
15/15 |
Your methodology section was broken down into five clear well explained steps. |
||
Analysis of study including: · Significance of study · Limitations · Data results included, real or predicted · Conclusions and recommendations
|
15/20 |
On the whole the significance and the limitations were well thought out and gave good detail. I would have liked it if you had used some actual data to support the eminently reasonable positions you took about this policy. |
||
· Comprehensive Speaker’s Notes are included with each slide |
20/20 |
Excellent Speaker’s Notes. |
||
Readability and Style |
5/5 |
Comments |
||
Slides are clear and easy to read |
All elements of Readability and Style were well met |
|||
Mechanics |
5/5 |
Comments |
||
The paper, including the title page, reference page, tables, and appendices, follow APA guidelines for format. |
All elements of Mechanics were met |
|||
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. |
||||
Spelling is correct. |
||||
Total Percent |
95/100 |
|
||
Total |
9.5/10 |
|
||
This was an excellent presentation on the policy evaluation process. I enjoyed reviewing it, thank you. |
|
|
||