Ashford Week 5 Payment

HRIS Comparison

Structure

Directions: You are tasked with finding a Human Resource Information System (HRIS) for an imaginary organization of your choice, with approximately 200 employees. Compare three HR Information Systems. These systems can be proprietary, open source, or a combination of both. Create a Table of Information (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to display the topics each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses. Select one of the three HRIS and provide an analysis that addresses the topics from the Human Resources/Talent management list below. Following your analysis, provide recommendations how you would modify the HRIS for use by the organization. Support your recommendation with literature. The modified system can be proprietary, open source, or a combination of both. For a list of proprietary systems please refer to the section titled “Vendor Software” on pages 580-581 in your text. For open source systems refer to The Top 12 Free and Open Source HR Software Systems (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. or the Best Open Source HRM and ERP Solutions (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. For help creating the Table of Information watch the video Table of Information (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Human Resources/Talent Management

• Recruiting
• Employee Information
• Training and Development
• Performance
• Termination/Retention
• Payroll and Taxes
• Holiday, Sickness, Vacation, Absenteeism
• Compensation
• Health Insurance
• Direct Deposit
• Job Postings
• Employee Assistance Programs
• Job Descriptions

The HRIS Comparison paper

• Must be 8 to 10 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
• Must include a separate title page with the following:
  • Title of paper
  • Student’s name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date submitted
• Must use at least 7 sources. This includes at least six appropriate contemporary or scholarly sources plus the textbook
  • The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
• Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
• Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
• Must provide section headers to clearly label each of the chosen sections.
• Must include citations and references to the text and at least six scholarly sources.
• Must use APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center to document all sources.
• Must include, on the final page, a reference page that is completed according to APA style, as outlined in the approved APA style guide.

HRM400.W5A1.04.2017

Description:

Total Possible Score: 30.00

Compares Three HR Information Systems (HRIS)

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Comprehensively compares three HR information systems.

Proficient - Compares three HR information systems. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally compares three or fewer HR information systems. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to compare fewer than three HR information systems; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The comparison of three HR information systems is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Creates a Table of Information to Display the Topics Each of the Chosen HRIS Systems Addresses

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Creates a comprehensive table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses.

Proficient - Creates a table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Creates a partial table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to create a table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Selects One HRIS and Analyzes the Topics from the Human Resources/Talent Management List Provided

Total: 6.00

Clearly selects one HRIS and compressively analyzes the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided.

Proficient - Selects one HRIS and analyzes the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.

Basic - Selects one HRIS and minimally analyzes the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to select one HRIS and analyze the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance - The selection of one HRIS and the analysis of the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Provides Recommendations on How to Modify the HRIS for Use by the Organization

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Provides thorough recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization.

Proficient - Provides recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Provides minimal recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. 

Below Expectations - Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Critical Thinking: Conclusions and Related Outcomes

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and clearly reflect an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Proficient - Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and reflect an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Basic - Conclusions and related outcomes are identified and minimally reflect an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Below Expectations - Conclusions and related outcomes are not logical or reflective of an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Powered by 

 

HRIS Comparison

Structure

Directions: You are tasked with finding a Human Resource Information System (HRIS) for an imaginary organization of your choice, with approximately 200 employees. Compare three HR Information Systems. These systems can be proprietary, open source, or a combination of both. Create a Table of Information (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to display the topics each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses. Select one of the three HRIS and provide an analysis that addresses the topics from the Human Resources/Talent management list below. Following your analysis, provide recommendations how you would modify the HRIS for use by the organization. Support your recommendation with literature. The modified system can be proprietary, open source, or a combination of both. For a list of proprietary systems please refer to the section titled “Vendor Software” on pages 580-581 in your text. For open source systems refer to The Top 12 Free and Open Source HR Software Systems (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. or the Best Open Source HRM and ERP Solutions (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. For help creating the Table of Information watch the video Table of Information (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Human Resources/Talent Management

• Recruiting
• Employee Information
• Training and Development
• Performance
• Termination/Retention
• Payroll and Taxes
• Holiday, Sickness, Vacation, Absenteeism
• Compensation
• Health Insurance
• Direct Deposit
• Job Postings
• Employee Assistance Programs
• Job Descriptions

The HRIS Comparison paper

• Must be 8 to 10 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
• Must include a separate title page with the following:
  • Title of paper
  • Student’s name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date submitted
• Must use at least 7 sources. This includes at least six appropriate contemporary or scholarly sources plus the textbook
  • The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
• Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
• Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
• Must provide section headers to clearly label each of the chosen sections.
• Must include citations and references to the text and at least six scholarly sources.
• Must use APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center to document all sources.
• Must include, on the final page, a reference page that is completed according to APA style, as outlined in the approved APA style guide.

HRM400.W5A1.04.2017

Description:

Total Possible Score: 30.00

Compares Three HR Information Systems (HRIS)

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Comprehensively compares three HR information systems.

Proficient - Compares three HR information systems. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally compares three or fewer HR information systems. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to compare fewer than three HR information systems; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The comparison of three HR information systems is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Creates a Table of Information to Display the Topics Each of the Chosen HRIS Systems Addresses

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Creates a comprehensive table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses.

Proficient - Creates a table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Creates a partial table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to create a table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Selects One HRIS and Analyzes the Topics from the Human Resources/Talent Management List Provided

Total: 6.00

Clearly selects one HRIS and compressively analyzes the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided.

Proficient - Selects one HRIS and analyzes the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.

Basic - Selects one HRIS and minimally analyzes the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to select one HRIS and analyze the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance - The selection of one HRIS and the analysis of the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Provides Recommendations on How to Modify the HRIS for Use by the Organization

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Provides thorough recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization.

Proficient - Provides recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Provides minimal recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. 

Below Expectations - Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Critical Thinking: Conclusions and Related Outcomes

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and clearly reflect an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Proficient - Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and reflect an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Basic - Conclusions and related outcomes are identified and minimally reflect an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Below Expectations - Conclusions and related outcomes are not logical or reflective of an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Powered by 

 

HRIS Comparison

Structure

Directions: You are tasked with finding a Human Resource Information System (HRIS) for an imaginary organization of your choice, with approximately 200 employees. Compare three HR Information Systems. These systems can be proprietary, open source, or a combination of both. Create a Table of Information (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to display the topics each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses. Select one of the three HRIS and provide an analysis that addresses the topics from the Human Resources/Talent management list below. Following your analysis, provide recommendations how you would modify the HRIS for use by the organization. Support your recommendation with literature. The modified system can be proprietary, open source, or a combination of both. For a list of proprietary systems please refer to the section titled “Vendor Software” on pages 580-581 in your text. For open source systems refer to The Top 12 Free and Open Source HR Software Systems (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. or the Best Open Source HRM and ERP Solutions (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. For help creating the Table of Information watch the video Table of Information (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Human Resources/Talent Management

• Recruiting
• Employee Information
• Training and Development
• Performance
• Termination/Retention
• Payroll and Taxes
• Holiday, Sickness, Vacation, Absenteeism
• Compensation
• Health Insurance
• Direct Deposit
• Job Postings
• Employee Assistance Programs
• Job Descriptions

The HRIS Comparison paper

• Must be 8 to 10 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
• Must include a separate title page with the following:
  • Title of paper
  • Student’s name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date submitted
• Must use at least 7 sources. This includes at least six appropriate contemporary or scholarly sources plus the textbook
  • The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
• Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
• Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
• Must provide section headers to clearly label each of the chosen sections.
• Must include citations and references to the text and at least six scholarly sources.
• Must use APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center to document all sources.
• Must include, on the final page, a reference page that is completed according to APA style, as outlined in the approved APA style guide.

HRM400.W5A1.04.2017

Description:

Total Possible Score: 30.00

Compares Three HR Information Systems (HRIS)

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Comprehensively compares three HR information systems.

Proficient - Compares three HR information systems. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally compares three or fewer HR information systems. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to compare fewer than three HR information systems; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The comparison of three HR information systems is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Creates a Table of Information to Display the Topics Each of the Chosen HRIS Systems Addresses

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Creates a comprehensive table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses.

Proficient - Creates a table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Creates a partial table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to create a table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The table of information to display the topics that each of the chosen HRIS systems addresses is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Selects One HRIS and Analyzes the Topics from the Human Resources/Talent Management List Provided

Total: 6.00

Clearly selects one HRIS and compressively analyzes the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided.

Proficient - Selects one HRIS and analyzes the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.

Basic - Selects one HRIS and minimally analyzes the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to select one HRIS and analyze the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance - The selection of one HRIS and the analysis of the topics from the human resources/talent management list provided are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Provides Recommendations on How to Modify the HRIS for Use by the Organization

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Provides thorough recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization.

Proficient - Provides recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Provides minimal recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The recommendations on how to modify the HRIS for use by the organization are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. 

Below Expectations - Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Critical Thinking: Conclusions and Related Outcomes

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and clearly reflect an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Proficient - Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and reflect an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Basic - Conclusions and related outcomes are identified and minimally reflect an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Below Expectations - Conclusions and related outcomes are not logical or reflective of an informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Powered by