PRG/211 PRG211 PRG 211 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT 1

Learning Team Evaluation Form

Team

Involvement

(Active and substantively involved in the team discussion)

Time

Management

(Supported team timeline)

Establishing and Following Guidelines
(Helped to define and adhere to the  goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team)

Professional

Communication

(Communicated clearly  and professionally)

Team
Contributions

(What did each team member contribute to the assignment?  What value did that contribution add to the completed assignment? )

Collaboration
Comments

(Please include any comments describing why each person received the collaboration score that you gave them.)

score

score

score

score

comments

comments

Self Score
(Your name)

Team Member (Name)

Team Member (Name)

Team Member (Name)

Team Member (Name)

Team Member (Name)

Team Member (Name)

Team Contributions

Please consider the following when providing individual and team feedback on contributions made to the assignment.

1)     Based on the contributions and collaboration for this assignment, should all team members get the same grade? If not, who should get a different grade (higher or lower) and why?

2)     What value you did you add to the completed product? How does that compare to your teammates?

3)     What can you, personally, do to improve future team collaborations?

*Please review the Learning Team Collaboration Guide on the next page for a description of the expectations for each category.

Learning Team Collaboration Guide

Team

Involvement

Time

Management

Establishing and Following Guidelines

Professional

Communication

Excellent (4)

Active and substantive  involvement in team discussions.

Supported team timeline and met the assignment due date.

Took the lead on establishing and following the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team.

Interacted with other members of the team with a respectful and professional tone. Communication was clear with no typographical or grammatical errors.

Good (3)

Good overall substantive involvement  in team discussion.

Supported a majority of the team timeline and met the assignment due date.

Helped to establish and follow the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team.

Interacted with other members of the team with a respectful and professional tone. Communication was clear with minor typographical or grammatical errors.

Fair (2)

Moderate substantive involvement  in team discussion.

Supported some of the team timeline and met the assignment due date.

Followed the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team.

Interacted with other members of the team with an informal tone. Communication was effective with minor typographical or grammatical errors.

Poor (1)

Minimal substantive involvement in team discussion.

Did not support  the team timeline but still met the assignment due date.

Did not always follow the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team.

Interactions with other members of the team were disrespectful and inappropriate at times. Communication was poor with numerous typographical or grammatical errors.

None (0)

No substantive involvement in team discussion.

Did not support  the team timeline .

Did not follow team goals, roles, or responsibilities.

No communication.