HRM/326 HRM326 HRM 326 WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT 2
- University of Phoenix / HRM 326
- 15 Sep 2017
- Price: $15
- Other / Other
HRM 326 WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT 2
Employee Assessment Case Study
During a global career succession assessment of leadership talent pipeline, a candidate was asked to complete a personality/behavioral tendency profile. The candidate asked to speak to the program administrator about the validity of the assessment. The assessment is based on first responses to several sets of word values. The instructions were to respond with first instinct to the set of words listed in several different categories. The candidate stated that some of the words could have different interpretations based on values, beliefs, and cultural origin. Therefore, the validity of the assessment could be biased in terms of results/outcomes. The program administrator removed the weighting of the assessment (not part of the overall assessment scoring) to be used for informational and team building purposes only.
Use the above information to answer the following in 700 to 1,050 words:
- Analyze whether the candidate has a valid discrimination concern about the assessment.
- Determine what EEOC regulations could potentially be at risk of violation.
- Evaluate how the assessment could be altered so that it could still be used for the program.
Cite all sources according to APA formatting guidelines.
Click on the Assignment Files tab to submit your case study.
Employee Assessment Grading Guide
HRM/326 Version 4
Employee Development
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these marks is not intended to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.
Individual Assignment: Employee Assessment Case Study
Purpose of Assignment
The purposes of this assignment is to review a case study concerning the legalities of employee assessments for succession planning purposes. The student will review the case and then determine what EEOC areas could pose a potential legal concern with the outcome of the assessment.
Grading Guide
|
Content 70 Percent |
Met
|
Partially Met |
Not Met
|
Comments: |
|
The student analyzes whether the candidate has a valid discrimination concern about the assessment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The student determines what EEOC laws could potentially be at risk of violation. |
|
|
|
|
|
The student evaluates how the assessment could be altered so that it could still be used for the program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The paper is between 700 and 1,050 words. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
7 |
#/7 |
|
|
Writing Guidelines 30 Percent |
Met
|
Partially Met |
Not Met
|
Comments: |
|
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. |
|
|
|
|
|
Paragraph and sentence transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
3 |
#/3 |
|
|
Assignment Total |
# |
10 |
#/10 |
|
|
Additional comments:
|
||||
USA 
India