PHI 103 Week 2 Quiz | Assignment Help | Ashford University(New)

PHI 103 Week 2 Quiz | Assignment Help | Ashford University(New) 

Question 1

 

The premises of inductive arguments are intended to: __________.

 

o   prove the conclusion

o   increase the likelihood that the conclusion is true

o   be valid

o   promote an interesting discussion of the truth of the conclusion

 

 

Question 2

In logic, which of the following is NOT true of all deductive arguments?

 

o   they reason from general to particular

o   they can be valid or invalid

o   if they are valid, it is impossible to have true premises and a false conclusion

o   if they are invalid, it is possible to have true premises and a false conclusion

o   none of these

 

 

Question 3

What type of inductive reasoning is the following argument?

“The author of the textbook states that Plato started a University, so he did.”

 

o   Statistical syllogism

o   Argument from authority

o   Inductive generalization

o   This is not an inductive argument.

 

 

Question 4

 

The margin of error is __________.

 

o   the percentage of a population that expresses a trait that is being studied

o   something that is not important in statistical arguments

o   the a likely range of difference that one can expect between the sample and the whole population

o   usually greater with larger sample populations

 

 

Question 5

Which of the following is true about inductive reasoning versus deductive reasoning?

 

o   Deductive reasoning is always preferable. You Answered

o   Inductive reasoning is always preferable.

o   Inductive reasoning is sometimes preferable.

o   One should only use inductive reasoning if one can’t find a valid argument.

 

 

Question 6

If an argument is valid, which of the following cannot be true?

 

o   all of its premises are true

o   its conclusion is false

o   all of its premises are true and its conclusion is false

o   the argument is unsound

 

 

Question 7

Which of the following would be a sound argument?

 

o   A valid argument with almost all true premises.

o   An argument with all true premises.

o   A valid argument with all true premises.

o   An argument in which the conclusion is definitely true.

o   an argument that just makes sense

 

 

Question 8

Inductive arguments should not be characterized as __________.

 

o   weak

o   very weak

o   valid

o   strong

 

 

Question 9

What is the word for an argument that is inductively strong and has all true premises?

 

o   Cogent.

o   Sound.

o   Valid.

o   True.

 

 

Question 10

“I once went to a football game, and my team lost. So, the next time I go to one of their games they will lose again.” This is an example of a __________.

 

o   strong inductive argument

o   valid inductive argument

o   sound deductive argument

o   weak inductive argument

 

 

Question 11

What does it mean for an argument to be invalid?

 

o   it has a false premise

o   it is possible for all of its premises to be true and its conclusion is false

o   the conclusion is stronger than the premises

o   the reasoning does not apply anymore

 

Question 12

What type of inductive argument is the following example?

“I had mincemeat pie once, and it was terrible. So, it will be terrible next time too.”

 

o   Argument from analogy

o   Inductive generalization

o   Statistical syllogism

o   Inference to the best explanation

 

 

Question 13

This form of inductive argument moves from the specific to the general __________.

 

o   inductive generalization

o   statistical syllogism

o   argument from analogy

o   deductive argument

 

 

 

 

 

Question 14

What type of inductive argument is the following example?

 “My dog loves broccoli. Your dog probably will too.”

 

o   Argument from analogy

o   Inductive generalization

o   Statistical syllogism

o   Inference to the best explanation

 

 

 

Question 15

What type of inductive argument is the following example?

“Most people who play the slots lose. Mike is playing the slots, so he is probably losing.”

 

o   Argument from analogy

o   Inductive generalization

o   Statistical syllogism

o   Inference to the best explanation

 

 

Question 16

Which of the following is NOT one of the correct descriptions of what it means for an argument to valid?

 

o   if all of the premises are true then the conclusion cannot be false

o   the reasoning is correct and all of the premises are in fact true

o   that it is logically impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false

o   the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion

 

 

Question 17

What type of inductive reasoning is the following argument?

“My friend is a philosopher, and he says that Descartes was an empiricist, so he was.”

 

o   Statistical syllogism

o   Argument from authority

o   Inductive generalization

o   This is not an inductive argument.

 

 

Question 18

Adding more premises to a valid deductive argument ____________.

 

o   can make it go from valid to invalid

o   can make it inductively stronger

o   can make the other premises true

o   cannot make it invalid

 

 

Question 19

Which of the following is a valid argument?

 

o   “All dogs are mammals. All cats are mammals. Therefore, all cats are dogs.”

o   “All dogs are mammals. Rover is a dog. Therefore, Rover is a mammal.”

o   “All dogs are mammals. Rover is a dog. So Rover has fur.”

o   None of these

 

 

Question 20

 

The acceptable confidence level for an analysis or experiment __________.

 

o   is the same across all fields

o   does not change based on what one is trying to determine

o   is more important for celebrities than for others

o   is often more than 90% in academic analyses

  

Answer Detail

Get This Answer

Invite Tutor