ACCT 100 Week 4 | Discussion | Assignment Help | american-public-university-system
- american-public-university-system / ACCT 100
- 08 Sep 2020
- Price: $8
- Other / Other
ACCT 100 Week 4 | Discussion | Assignment Help | american-public-university-system
Week 4 - Midterm
Please select and discuss one of
the following issues:
- A business purchases an acre of land for
$5,000. The current market value is $5,550, and the land was assessed for
property tax purposes at $5,250. What value should the land be recorded
at, and which accounting principle supports your answer?
- Which method of accounting (cash or accrual
basis) is consistent with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles? Why?
- Identify two asset or liability categories on
the classified balance sheet, and give examples of each category.
Your initial post must be in your own words and be supported with a
reference. Post at least two peer responses further discussing and
exploring the materials covered this week.
Adhere to Forum Grading Requirements as detailed below.
Forum Instructions
Students must post a main response to the weekly discussion question by
Day 3, and at least two
replies to other students by Day 7. Active participation is
required by replying to classmates during the week of discussion. Therefore,
replies after the end of the each week will not be graded. The forums are for student
interaction and submitting input after the end of the week serves no learning
objectives and does not constitute as participation. Students should
demonstrate their own knowledge in the forums and avoid copying and pasting
from web sites. Responses will be graded directly from the Forums.
Make sure you are using credible sources in your discussions and assignments.
Scholarly journals are the preferred source of credible/quality references.
These consist of peer-reviewed articles published in academic journals related
to the field, which are found via our Library. Websites such as
Investopedia, ask.com, answers.com, or dictionary-type of websites limit the
insight to the topics. Wikipedia is not acceptable as it is not a reliable or
credible source of reference. The purpose is to bring in new information and
how does it apply to our topic from a real-world perspective, instead of
extending on definitions that are found in the book.
More information what a credible source consists of can be found
here: http://writingcommons.org/evidence/supporting-sources/630-what-might-be-a-more-credible-reliable-source.